From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754074Ab1JTGK0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Oct 2011 02:10:26 -0400 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:49971 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752757Ab1JTGKY (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Oct 2011 02:10:24 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.67,351,1309762800"; d="scan'208";a="64994740" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Code clean up for percpu_xxx() functions From: "Alex,Shi" To: Eric Dumazet Cc: Christoph Lameter , "tj@kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "Huang, Ying" , Thomas Gleixner , "mingo@redhat.com" , "avi@redhat.com" , "akpm@linux-foundation.org" , David Miller , "kaber@trash.net" , "a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl" , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , "jeremy@xensource.com" In-Reply-To: <1319090667.23426.159.camel@debian> References: <1318237851.27949.190.camel@debian> <1318324774.27949.693.camel@debian> <1318382964.27949.782.camel@debian> <1318428673.29699.13.camel@debian> <1318908091.23426.52.camel@debian> <1319016218.23426.104.camel@debian> <1319078687.23426.146.camel@debian> <1319087281.8416.45.camel@edumazet-laptop> <1319090667.23426.159.camel@debian> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 14:13:22 +0800 Message-ID: <1319091202.23426.163.camel@debian> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 14:04 +0800, Alex,Shi wrote: > > Sorry this huge patch brings too many potential bugs. > > > > I ask you a separate patch for the networking part, because I dont want > > to Ack all the other parts. > > > > Thanks a lot for review! I split the first patch into 2 according your > suggestion. The second one for network here: Sorry for too big patch, any other split requirements?