From: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] kdump: Fix crash_kexec - smp_send_stop race in panic
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 16:34:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1319639649.3321.11.camel@br98xy6r> (raw)
Hello Andrew,
After the discussion with Eric and Vivek the following patch
seems to be a good solution to me. Could you accept this patch?
When two CPUs call panic at the same time there is a
possible race condition that can stop kdump. The first
CPU calls crash_kexec() and the second CPU calls
smp_send_stop() in panic() before crash_kexec() finished
on the first CPU. So the second CPU stops the first CPU
and therefore kdump fails:
1st CPU:
panic()->crash_kexec()->mutex_trylock(&kexec_mutex)-> do kdump
2nd CPU:
panic()->crash_kexec()->kexec_mutex already held by 1st CPU
->smp_send_stop()-> stop 1st CPU (stop kdump)
This patch fixes the problem by introducing a spinlock in
panic that allows only one CPU to process crash_kexec() and
the subsequent panic code.
Signed-off-by: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
kernel/panic.c | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
--- a/kernel/panic.c
+++ b/kernel/panic.c
@@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(panic_blink);
*/
NORET_TYPE void panic(const char * fmt, ...)
{
+ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(panic_lock);
static char buf[1024];
va_list args;
long i, i_next = 0;
@@ -82,6 +83,13 @@ NORET_TYPE void panic(const char * fmt,
#endif
/*
+ * Only one CPU is allowed to execute the panic code from here. For
+ * multiple parallel invocations of panic all other CPUs will wait on
+ * the panic_lock. They are stopped afterwards by smp_send_stop().
+ */
+ spin_lock(&panic_lock);
+
+ /*
* If we have crashed and we have a crash kernel loaded let it handle
* everything else.
* Do we want to call this before we try to display a message?
next reply other threads:[~2011-10-26 14:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-26 14:34 Michael Holzheu [this message]
2011-10-27 17:40 ` [PATCH] kdump: Fix crash_kexec - smp_send_stop race in panic Vivek Goyal
2011-10-28 23:11 ` Andrew Morton
2011-10-31 9:57 ` Michael Holzheu
2011-10-31 10:39 ` Andrew Morton
2011-10-31 12:34 ` [PATCH v2] " Michael Holzheu
2011-11-01 20:04 ` Don Zickus
2011-11-02 10:03 ` Michael Holzheu
2011-11-02 20:57 ` Luck, Tony
2011-11-03 10:07 ` [PATCH] " Michael Holzheu
2011-11-10 0:04 ` Andrew Morton
2011-11-10 14:17 ` Américo Wang
2011-11-10 15:31 ` James Bottomley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1319639649.3321.11.camel@br98xy6r \
--to=holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox