The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
	schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com,
	kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] kdump: Fix crash_kexec - smp_send_stop race in panic
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 16:34:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1319639649.3321.11.camel@br98xy6r> (raw)

Hello Andrew,

After the discussion with Eric and Vivek the following patch
seems to be a good solution to me. Could you accept this patch?

When two CPUs call panic at the same time there is a
possible race condition that can stop kdump. The first
CPU calls crash_kexec() and the second CPU calls
smp_send_stop() in panic() before crash_kexec() finished
on the first CPU. So the second CPU stops the first CPU
and therefore kdump fails:

1st CPU:
panic()->crash_kexec()->mutex_trylock(&kexec_mutex)-> do kdump

2nd CPU:
panic()->crash_kexec()->kexec_mutex already held by 1st CPU
       ->smp_send_stop()-> stop 1st CPU (stop kdump)

This patch fixes the problem by introducing a spinlock in
panic that allows only one CPU to process crash_kexec() and
the subsequent panic code.

Signed-off-by: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 kernel/panic.c |    8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

--- a/kernel/panic.c
+++ b/kernel/panic.c
@@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(panic_blink);
  */
 NORET_TYPE void panic(const char * fmt, ...)
 {
+	static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(panic_lock);
 	static char buf[1024];
 	va_list args;
 	long i, i_next = 0;
@@ -82,6 +83,13 @@ NORET_TYPE void panic(const char * fmt,
 #endif
 
 	/*
+	 * Only one CPU is allowed to execute the panic code from here. For
+	 * multiple parallel invocations of panic all other CPUs will wait on
+	 * the panic_lock. They are stopped afterwards by smp_send_stop().
+	 */
+	spin_lock(&panic_lock);
+
+	/*
 	 * If we have crashed and we have a crash kernel loaded let it handle
 	 * everything else.
 	 * Do we want to call this before we try to display a message?



             reply	other threads:[~2011-10-26 14:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-10-26 14:34 Michael Holzheu [this message]
2011-10-27 17:40 ` [PATCH] kdump: Fix crash_kexec - smp_send_stop race in panic Vivek Goyal
2011-10-28 23:11 ` Andrew Morton
2011-10-31  9:57   ` Michael Holzheu
2011-10-31 10:39     ` Andrew Morton
2011-10-31 12:34       ` [PATCH v2] " Michael Holzheu
2011-11-01 20:04         ` Don Zickus
2011-11-02 10:03           ` Michael Holzheu
2011-11-02 20:57             ` Luck, Tony
2011-11-03 10:07       ` [PATCH] " Michael Holzheu
2011-11-10  0:04         ` Andrew Morton
2011-11-10 14:17           ` Américo Wang
2011-11-10 15:31           ` James Bottomley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1319639649.3321.11.camel@br98xy6r \
    --to=holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox