linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	eric.dumazet@gmail.com, shaohua.li@intel.com, ak@linux.intel.com,
	mhocko@suse.cz, alex.shi@intel.com, efault@gmx.de,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL rcu/next] RCU commits for 3.1
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2011 16:15:02 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1320678902.18053.63.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4EAF5B68.8090005@cn.fujitsu.com>

So far nobody seems to have stated if this is an actual problem or just
shutting up lockdep-prove-rcu? I very much suspect the latter, in which
case I really utterly hate the patch because it adds instructions to
fast-paths just to kill a debug warning.

On Tue, 2011-11-01 at 10:37 +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
> 
> With the following patch, we should see no rcu warning from perf, but as I
> don't know the internel of perf, I guess we have to defer to Peter and
> Stephane. ;)
> 
> I have two doubts:
> 
> - in perf_cgroup_sched_out/in(), we retrieve the task's cgroup twice in the function
> and it's callee perf_cgroup_switch(), but the task can move to another cgroup between
> two calls, so they might return two different cgroup pointers. Does it matter?
> 
> - in perf_cgroup_switch():
> 
>          cpuctx->cgrp = perf_cgroup_from_task(task);
> 
> but seems the cgroup is not pinned, so cpuctx->cgrp can be invalid in later use.
> 
> ---
> diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
> index d1a1bee..f5e05ce 100644
> --- a/kernel/events/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/core.c
> @@ -302,7 +302,10 @@ static inline void update_cgrp_time_from_event(struct perf_event *event)
>         if (!is_cgroup_event(event))
>                 return;
>  
> +       rcu_read_lock();
>         cgrp = perf_cgroup_from_task(current);
> +       rcu_read_unlock();
> +
>         /*
>          * Do not update time when cgroup is not active
>          */

This looks like shutting things up, because what protects the use of
cgrp after rcu_read_unlock() ?

Similar to the below, this is a stupid patch to shut things up, no
actual problem there, just making a hot path slow.

> @@ -325,9 +328,11 @@ perf_cgroup_set_timestamp(struct task_struct *task,
>         if (!task || !ctx->nr_cgroups)
>                 return;
>  
> +       rcu_read_lock();
>         cgrp = perf_cgroup_from_task(task);
>         info = this_cpu_ptr(cgrp->info);
>         info->timestamp = ctx->timestamp;
> +       rcu_read_unlock();
>  }

This seems to actually protect the cgrp usage, but is that needed?

It looks to be superfluous, since
perf_cgroup_attach_task()->__perf_cgroup_move()->perf_cgroup_switch()
will hold ctx->lock when it switches a task from one cgroup to another
and perf_cgroup_set_timestamp() should only ever be called while holding
the ctx->lock since that is what is used to serialize the timestamps.

>  #define PERF_CGROUP_SWOUT      0x1 /* cgroup switch out every event */
> @@ -406,6 +411,8 @@ static inline void perf_cgroup_sched_out(struct task_struct *task,
>         struct perf_cgroup *cgrp1;
>         struct perf_cgroup *cgrp2 = NULL;
>  
> +       rcu_read_lock();
> +
>         /*
>          * we come here when we know perf_cgroup_events > 0
>          */
> @@ -418,6 +425,8 @@ static inline void perf_cgroup_sched_out(struct task_struct *task,
>         if (next)
>                 cgrp2 = perf_cgroup_from_task(next);
>  
> +       rcu_read_unlock();
> +
>         /*
>          * only schedule out current cgroup events if we know
>          * that we are switching to a different cgroup. Otherwise,

This only hides a warning and leaves a race.

> @@ -433,6 +442,8 @@ static inline void perf_cgroup_sched_in(struct task_struct *prev,
>         struct perf_cgroup *cgrp1;
>         struct perf_cgroup *cgrp2 = NULL;
>  
> +       rcu_read_lock();
> +
>         /*
>          * we come here when we know perf_cgroup_events > 0
>          */
> @@ -441,6 +452,8 @@ static inline void perf_cgroup_sched_in(struct task_struct *prev,
>         /* prev can never be NULL */
>         cgrp2 = perf_cgroup_from_task(prev);
>  
> +       rcu_read_unlock();
> +
>         /*
>          * only need to schedule in cgroup events if we are changing
>          * cgroup during ctxsw. Cgroup events were not scheduled
> 

idem.

So no, this patch utterly sucks, it adds code to hot paths just to quiet
debug warnings in two cases and the remaining two cases annotates a
warning away while leaving an actual problem unfixed.



  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-11-07 15:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20110930204503.GA32687@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
     [not found] ` <20111001152514.GA16930@elte.hu>
     [not found]   ` <20111003055302.GA23527@elte.hu>
     [not found]     ` <20111003161335.GA2403@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2011-10-04  7:46       ` [GIT PULL rcu/next] RCU commits for 3.1 Ingo Molnar
2011-10-24 10:05         ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-10-24 11:48           ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-10-26 20:30             ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-27  7:59               ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-10-27  8:00                 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-28  2:34                   ` Li Zefan
2011-10-29 18:27                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-10-31  8:09                       ` Li Zefan
2011-10-31  9:32                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-01  2:37                           ` Li Zefan
2011-11-02 19:23                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-02 19:55                               ` Stephane Eranian
2011-11-03 12:50                             ` Stephane Eranian
2011-11-04  8:44                               ` Li Zefan
2011-11-04  9:02                                 ` Stephane Eranian
2011-11-07 14:24                                   ` Stephane Eranian
2011-11-07 14:41                                     ` Eric Dumazet
2011-11-07 14:44                                       ` Stephane Eranian
2011-11-07 15:15                             ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2011-11-07 16:16                               ` Stephane Eranian
2011-11-07 16:35                                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-11-07 16:56                                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-07 17:09                                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-11-07 17:55                                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-08 13:10                                         ` Stephane Eranian
2011-11-07 17:11                                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-11-07 17:12                                     ` Stephane Eranian
2011-11-07 17:26                                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-11-07 17:50                                         ` Stephane Eranian
2011-11-07 17:53                                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-11-07 17:53                                       ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1320678902.18053.63.camel@twins \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alex.shi@intel.com \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=pjt@google.com \
    --cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).