Re: [PATCH v3] printk: add console output tracing

Steven Rostedt
2012-02-13T17:42:16Z

On Mon, 2012-02-13 at 18:33 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-02-13 at 12:30 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-11-24 at 20:03 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > > From: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
> > >
> > > Add a printk.console trace point to record any printk
> > > messages into the trace, regardless of the current
> > > console loglevel. This can help correlate (existing)
> > > printk debugging with other tracing.
> > >
> >
> > Looks like this patch got lost in the x-mas parade.
> >
> > Is this the last version of the patch?
> >
> > In the thread I also see:
> >
> > Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
> > Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
> > Acked-by-me (Thomas Gleixner)
>
> I don't think I made a newer version, in fact, I dropped it from my
> local tree already :)

Well, then, I'll add it to my current queue then. I'll include the above
acked-bys too if no one is against it. Speak now if you are! ;-)

-- Steve