The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: York Sun <yorksun@freescale.com>
To: <guenter.roeck@ericsson.com>
Cc: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>,
	Tabi Timur-B04825 <B04825@freescale.com>,
	"linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"B29983@freescale.com" <B29983@freescale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c/busses: (mpc) Add support for SMBUS_READ_BLOCK_DATA
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 11:23:48 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1321557828.16541.62.camel@oslab-l1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1321553924.2730.7.camel@groeck-laptop>

> > That's the point. Your patch doesn't check if the length is valid. You
> > rely on the caller to know no more than 32 bytes can be transferred. It
> > shouldn't limit the subfunction to transfer more than 32 bytes if
> > hardware can support it by multiple transactions. If not, print out an
> > error message.
> > 
> 
> It is customary for kernel functions to only validate parameters
> wherever a value enters or leaves the kernel, or at least a logical
> boundary. Anything else would blow up the kernel size to a point where
> it would be unusable. The patch checks if the block length received from
> the SMBus slave is correct, which is exactly what it is supposed to do.
> 
> If you look closely, you may realize that the mpc_read also doesn't
> validate of any of the other parameters. Are you going to request that
> such validations be added as well ? How about the other functions in
> this driver ? Should each function also validate each of its
> parameters ? If not, where do you draw the line ?
> 
> Besides, the caller is the SMBus block read function, which does know
> that SMBus block reads are limited to 32 bytes (plus length).
> 

I am going to let it go for now. Obviously your patch is working when
length=1. Probably it will never be called with length other than 1 for
SMBus block read. It would be nicer if you could put a comment there
just in case in the future someone runs into a case where length+=byte
causes a problem.

York




  reply	other threads:[~2011-11-17 19:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-11-15  6:27 [PATCH] i2c/busses: (mpc) Add support for SMBUS_READ_BLOCK_DATA Guenter Roeck
2011-11-15  8:54 ` Jean Delvare
2011-11-15 16:29   ` Guenter Roeck
2011-11-15 19:02   ` Tabi Timur-B04825
2011-11-15 19:14     ` Guenter Roeck
2011-11-15 20:05       ` Jean Delvare
2011-11-15 21:14         ` Guenter Roeck
     [not found] ` <CAOZdJXUPO5PyMkAw-2EPvy_qSUuqsgUA7Gr8mKUX7HyShoXk3g@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]   ` <E6AF40B3BFC8A9428EACB47497F0F4B62DC687@039-SN1MPN1-002.039d.mgd.msft.net>
     [not found]     ` <ECEE0D23-8F53-402C-A97F-4DB0F0E9C79B@freescale.com>
2011-11-16 17:28       ` York Sun
2011-11-16 17:36         ` Guenter Roeck
2011-11-16 17:55           ` York Sun
2011-11-16 18:09             ` Guenter Roeck
2011-11-16 18:09             ` Jean Delvare
2011-11-16 18:20               ` York Sun
2011-11-16 18:51                 ` Guenter Roeck
2011-11-16 18:56                   ` Timur Tabi
2011-11-16 18:58                   ` sun york-R58495
2011-11-16 19:10                 ` Jean Delvare
2011-11-16 19:15                   ` York Sun
2011-11-16 19:18                     ` Jean Delvare
2011-11-16 19:24                       ` York Sun
2011-11-17 18:18                         ` Guenter Roeck
2011-11-17 19:23                           ` York Sun [this message]
2011-11-18  3:15                           ` Tang Yuantian-B29983
2011-12-01  7:06                       ` Tang Yuantian-B29983
2011-12-07  2:52                       ` Tang Yuantian-B29983
2011-12-07  3:20                         ` Guenter Roeck
2011-12-07  5:25                           ` Tang Yuantian-B29983
2011-12-07  7:29                             ` Jean Delvare
2012-02-23  6:57                               ` Huang Changming-R66093
2011-11-16 17:38         ` Jean Delvare
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-12-12  4:10 Yuantian.tang
2011-12-12  9:28 ` Guenter Roeck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1321557828.16541.62.camel@oslab-l1 \
    --to=yorksun@freescale.com \
    --cc=B04825@freescale.com \
    --cc=B29983@freescale.com \
    --cc=guenter.roeck@ericsson.com \
    --cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox