From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754540Ab1KSBrV (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Nov 2011 20:47:21 -0500 Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.125]:58104 "EHLO hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751749Ab1KSBrU (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Nov 2011 20:47:20 -0500 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=JOm5Qr2b c=1 sm=0 a=ZycB6UtQUfgMyuk2+PxD7w==:17 a=XgzihCSdOgwA:10 a=5SG0PmZfjMsA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=meVymXHHAAAA:8 a=DOp0XZiC6rXYTvXu5DUA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=jeBq3FmKZ4MA:10 a=ZycB6UtQUfgMyuk2+PxD7w==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 74.67.80.29 Subject: Re: [BUG] e1000: possible deadlock scenario caught by lockdep From: Steven Rostedt To: Jesse Brandeburg Cc: LKML , Thomas Gleixner , "Dave, Tushar N" , "Brown, Aaron F" , "Kirsher, Jeffrey T" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net" In-Reply-To: <20111118151704.0000007b@unknown> References: <1321579620.3533.29.camel@frodo> <20111118085737.0000387f@unknown> <20111118151704.0000007b@unknown> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 20:47:16 -0500 Message-ID: <1321667236.3533.59.camel@frodo> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 (2.32.3-1.fc14) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2011-11-18 at 15:17 -0800, Jesse Brandeburg wrote: > this is a proposed patch to fix the issue: > if it works for you please let me know and I will submit it officially > through our process Well, the one time I tested it, it didn't crash and it didn't give a lockdep splat either. I'll add it and reboot it a few more times and I'll holler if something bad happens. Tested-by: Steven Rostedt -- Steve