public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
To: Jiri Polach <jiri.polach@seznam.cz>
Cc: Jiri Polach <clarinet@atlas.cz>,
	647095@bugs.debian.org, Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>,
	Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: CPU hyperthreading turned on after soft power-cycle
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 12:02:08 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1321905728.6445.2.camel@work-vm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4ECA51B9.3010707@seznam.cz>

On Mon, 2011-11-21 at 14:27 +0100, Jiri Polach wrote:
> >>>> Finally! After another 50+ compilations a have it! It took some time as
> >>>> first I had to find a reason why some revisions did not boot (almost 2/3
> >>>> were unbootable and the first bad commit was among them). Having this
> >>>> solved I have been able to bisect without "skipping". The result is
> >>>> surprising (at least for me) - believe it or not, the first bad commit
> >>>> is 6610e089 "RTC: Rework RTC code to use timerqueue for events" from
> >>>> John Stultz (I am sending him a copy of this message).
> >>>>
> >>>> I would never expect this would be a problem, but my understanding of
> >>>> this commit is very limited, so I am certainly missing the point.
> >>>> However, I have tried to compile 2.6.38 (which was "bad") with "Real
> >>>> Time Clock" configuration option turned off and it behaves "normally"
> >>>> then (= is "good").
> >>>
> >>> Huh. That's *very* odd.  Is your system doing anything in-particular
> >>> with the RTC?  I don't have a clue right off, so probably the next step
> >>
> >> Yes, it is very odd. The system does not do anything special with RTC.
> >> It is a diskless computational workstation.
> >>
> >>> is doing a bit of instrumentation to try to figure out where exactly we
> >>> trigger the behavior. Could you checkout commit 6610e089 and apply the
> >>> patch below to see if we can't narrow it down?
> >>
> >> With the patch applied the system does not show the strange behavior (=
> >> is "good").
> >>
> >>> Could you also send your .config to me?
> >>
> >> Sure. It is attached. I have found that if I turn CONFIG_RTC_DRV_CMOS
> >> off, the system behaves normally (= is "good") too.
> >
> > Yea. My rough guess is that the BIOS is somehow sensitive to how the
> > CMOS RTC is touched.
> >
> > Does disabling CONFIG_HPET_EMULATE_RTC change the behavior?
> 
> But how do I do it? :-)
> 
> I have not found a way to disable it in "menuconfig". If I comment it 
> out manually in .config, it is automatically set back to "y" as soon as 
> compilation starts ...

Good point. I forgot on x86_64 you can't disable HPET_TIMER.

Could you then use the following patch (and run make oldconfig before
building).

thanks
-john


diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
index cb9a104..77b5273 100644
--- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
@@ -640,7 +640,7 @@ config HPET_TIMER
 	  Choose N to continue using the legacy 8254 timer.
 
 config HPET_EMULATE_RTC
-	def_bool y
+	def_bool n
 	depends on HPET_TIMER && (RTC=y || RTC=m || RTC_DRV_CMOS=m || RTC_DRV_CMOS=y)
 
 config APB_TIMER




  reply	other threads:[~2011-11-21 20:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20111030110543.5872.61279.reportbug@supermicro.uochb.cas.cz>
2011-10-30 15:25 ` CPU hyperthreading turned on after soft power-cycle Ben Hutchings
2011-10-31 13:06   ` Clarinet
2011-11-08 12:33     ` Jiri Polach
2011-11-10  1:52       ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-11-11 13:50         ` Clarinet
2011-11-16 22:49           ` Clarinet
2011-11-17 20:32             ` John Stultz
2011-11-17 23:42               ` Jiri Polach
2011-11-17 23:53                 ` John Stultz
2011-11-21 13:27                   ` Jiri Polach
2011-11-21 20:02                     ` John Stultz [this message]
2011-11-21 21:31                       ` Jiri Polach
2011-11-29  2:31                         ` John Stultz
2011-11-29 12:26                           ` Clarinet
2011-11-29 23:34                             ` John Stultz
2011-12-02 10:44                               ` Clarinet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1321905728.6445.2.camel@work-vm \
    --to=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=647095@bugs.debian.org \
    --cc=ben@decadent.org.uk \
    --cc=clarinet@atlas.cz \
    --cc=jiri.polach@seznam.cz \
    --cc=jrnieder@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox