From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf_event: fix loss of notification with multi-event sampling
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 22:15:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1321996541.14799.23.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABPqkBT+XT4Oq9p0aquJgFZy8DBVudamFU4jRZqmdLUDR-Cpqg@mail.gmail.com>
the only thing I can seem to come up with is something like the below
and uglier..
the below isn't compiled and I suspect there's still a race between poll
and perf_event_set_output() which we could plug by taking mmap_mutex in
perf_poll() but that'd be cheating..
also, yuck!
---
Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/perf_event.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/perf_event.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -833,6 +833,7 @@ struct perf_event {
struct ring_buffer *rb;
/* poll related */
+ struct list_head rb_entry;
wait_queue_head_t waitq;
struct fasync_struct *fasync;
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/events/core.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/events/core.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -3014,8 +3014,10 @@ static unsigned int perf_poll(struct fil
rcu_read_lock();
rb = rcu_dereference(event->rb);
- if (rb)
+ if (rb) {
+ ring_buffer_attach(event, rb);
events = atomic_xchg(&rb->poll, 0);
+ }
rcu_read_unlock();
poll_wait(file, &event->waitq, wait);
@@ -3321,6 +3323,47 @@ static int perf_mmap_fault(struct vm_are
return ret;
}
+static void ring_buffer_attach(struct perf_event *event, struct ring_buffer *rb)
+{
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ if (!list_empty(&event->rb_entry))
+ return;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&rb->event_lock, flags);
+ if (!list_empty(&event->rb_entry))
+ goto unlock;
+
+ list_add(&event->rb_entry, rb->event_list);
+unlock:
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rb->event_lock, flags);
+}
+
+static void ring_buffer_detach(struct perf_event *event, struct ring_buffer *rb)
+{
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ if (list_empty(&event->rb_entry))
+ return;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&rb->event_lock, flags);
+ list_del_init(&event->rb_entry);
+ wake_up_all(&event->waitq);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rb->event_lock, flags);
+}
+
+static void ring_buffer_wakeup(struct perf_event *event)
+{
+ struct ring_buffer *rb;
+
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ rb = rcu_dereference(event->rb);
+ list_for_each_entry_rcu(event, rb->event_list, rb_entry) {
+ wake_up_all(!event->waitq);
+ }
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+}
+
static void rb_free_rcu(struct rcu_head *rcu_head)
{
struct ring_buffer *rb;
@@ -3346,9 +3389,19 @@ static struct ring_buffer *ring_buffer_g
static void ring_buffer_put(struct ring_buffer *rb)
{
+ struct perf_event *event, *n;
+ unsigned long flags;
+
if (!atomic_dec_and_test(&rb->refcount))
return;
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&rb->event_lock, flags);
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(event, n, &rb->event_list, rb_entry) {
+ list_del_init(&event->rb_entry);
+ wake_up_all(&event->waitq);
+ }
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rb->event_lock, flags);
+
call_rcu(&rb->rcu_head, rb_free_rcu);
}
@@ -3371,6 +3424,7 @@ static void perf_mmap_close(struct vm_ar
atomic_long_sub((size >> PAGE_SHIFT) + 1, &user->locked_vm);
vma->vm_mm->pinned_vm -= event->mmap_locked;
rcu_assign_pointer(event->rb, NULL);
+ ring_buffer_detach(event, rb);
mutex_unlock(&event->mmap_mutex);
ring_buffer_put(rb);
@@ -3527,7 +3581,7 @@ static const struct file_operations perf
void perf_event_wakeup(struct perf_event *event)
{
- wake_up_all(&event->waitq);
+ ring_buffer_wakeup(event);
if (event->pending_kill) {
kill_fasync(&event->fasync, SIGIO, event->pending_kill);
@@ -5882,6 +5936,8 @@ perf_event_set_output(struct perf_event
old_rb = event->rb;
rcu_assign_pointer(event->rb, rb);
+ if (old_rb)
+ ring_buffer_detach(event, old_rb);
ret = 0;
unlock:
mutex_unlock(&event->mmap_mutex);
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/events/internal.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/events/internal.h
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/events/internal.h
@@ -27,6 +27,10 @@ struct ring_buffer {
long watermark; /* wakeup watermark */
+ /* poll crap */
+ spinlock_t event_lock;
+ struct list_struct event_list;
+
struct perf_event_mmap_page *user_page;
void *data_pages[0];
};
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-22 21:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-16 14:53 [PATCH] perf_event: fix loss of notification with multi-event sampling Stephane Eranian
2011-11-22 10:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-11-22 13:15 ` Stephane Eranian
2011-11-22 13:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-11-22 14:13 ` Stephane Eranian
2011-11-22 14:28 ` Stephane Eranian
2011-11-22 21:15 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2011-11-23 9:30 ` Stephane Eranian
2011-11-23 10:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-11-23 10:10 ` Stephane Eranian
2011-11-23 10:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1321996541.14799.23.camel@twins \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox