From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754247Ab1KWLzj (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Nov 2011 06:55:39 -0500 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:59506 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753261Ab1KWLzi convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Nov 2011 06:55:38 -0500 Message-ID: <1322049330.14799.43.camel@twins> Subject: Re: [patch 4/7] sched: convert rq->avg_idle to rq->avg_event From: Peter Zijlstra To: Mike Galbraith Cc: Suresh Siddha , linux-kernel , Ingo Molnar , Paul Turner Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 12:55:30 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1321971751.6855.19.camel@marge.simson.net> References: <1321350377.1421.55.camel@twins> <1321406062.16760.60.camel@sbsiddha-desk.sc.intel.com> <1321435455.5072.64.camel@marge.simson.net> <1321468646.11680.2.camel@sbsiddha-desk.sc.intel.com> <1321495153.5100.7.camel@marge.simson.net> <1321544313.6308.25.camel@marge.simson.net> <1321545376.2495.1.camel@laptop> <1321547917.6308.48.camel@marge.simson.net> <1321551381.15339.21.camel@sbsiddha-desk.sc.intel.com> <1321629267.7080.13.camel@marge.simson.net> <1321629441.7080.15.camel@marge.simson.net> <1321630552.2197.15.camel@twins> <1321971445.6855.14.camel@marge.simson.net> <1321971751.6855.19.camel@marge.simson.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.1- Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 15:22 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote: > We update rq->clock only at points of interest to the scheduler. > Using this distance has the same effect as measuring idle time > for idle_balance() throttling, and allows other uses as well. I'm not sure I follow, suppose we're happily context switching away, how is the avg distance between context switches related to idle time?