From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755888Ab1KWNqU (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Nov 2011 08:46:20 -0500 Received: from mtagate2.uk.ibm.com ([194.196.100.162]:36396 "EHLO mtagate2.uk.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755606Ab1KWNqT (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Nov 2011 08:46:19 -0500 Message-ID: <1322055976.10119.17.camel@br98xy6r> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] kdump: crashk_res init check for /sys/kernel/kexec_crash_size From: Michael Holzheu Reply-To: holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com To: Dave Young Cc: heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Simon Horman , "Eric W. Biederman" , schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, Vivek Goyal Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 14:46:16 +0100 In-Reply-To: <4ECCF669.6080007@redhat.com> References: <1322043068.10119.7.camel@br98xy6r> <20111123102214.GA4914@verge.net.au> <1322054283.10119.11.camel@br98xy6r> <4ECCF669.6080007@redhat.com> Organization: IBM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.0- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Dave, On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 21:34 +0800, Dave Young wrote: > On 11/23/2011 09:18 PM, Michael Holzheu wrote: > > > From: Michael Holzheu > > > > Currently it is possible to set the crash_size via the sysfs > > /sys/kernel/kexec_crash_size even if no crash kernel memory has > > been defined with the "crashkernel" parameter. In this case > > "crashk_res" is not initialized and crashk_res.start = crashk_res.end = 0. > > Unfortunately resource_size(&crashk_res) returns 1 in this case. > > This breaks the s390 implementation of crash_(un)map_reserved_pages(). > > > > To fix the problem the correct "old_size" is now calculated in > > crash_shrink_memory(). "old_size is set to "0" if crashk_res is > > not initialized. With this change crash_shrink_memory() will do nothing, > > when "crashk_res" is not initialized. It will return "0" for > > "echo 0 > /sys/kernel/kexec_crash_size" and -EINVAL for > > "echo [not zero] > /sys/kernel/kexec_crash_size". > > > > In addition to that this patch also simplifies the "ret = -EINVAL" > > vs. "ret = 0" logic as suggested by Simon Horman. > > > > Cc: Simon Horman > > Signed-off-by: Michael Holzheu > > --- > > kernel/kexec.c | 10 ++++------ > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > > > --- a/kernel/kexec.c > > +++ b/kernel/kexec.c > > @@ -1131,7 +1131,7 @@ void __weak crash_free_reserved_phys_ran > > int crash_shrink_memory(unsigned long new_size) > > { > > int ret = 0; > > - unsigned long start, end; > > + unsigned long start, end, old_size; > > > Sorry for jump in a little late, instead of introduce a new variable, > why not add something like: > > if (!end) > return -EINVAL; If the crashkernel parameter is not set, "/sys/kernel/kexec_crash_size" returns zero: cat /sys/kernel/kexec_crash_size 0 So I think if we set it again to zero we should *not* return -EINVAL: echo 0 > /sys/kernel/kexec_crash_size --> Exit code should be zero in this case Otherwise we would change the current behavior. And besides of that, I think introducing the "old_size" variable makes the code more readable. Michael