From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: benh@kernel.crashing.org, yinghai@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com,
tony.luck@intel.com, ralf@linux-mips.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com,
liqin.chen@sunplusct.com, lethal@linux-sh.org,
davem@davemloft.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, jonas@southpole.se,
lennox.wu@gmail.com
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 12/23] memblock: Track total size of regions automatically
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 11:31:14 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1322508685-32532-13-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1322508685-32532-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
Total size of memory regions was calculated by memblock_analyze()
requiring explicitly calling the function between operations which can
change memory regions and possible users of total size, which is
cumbersome and fragile.
This patch makes each memblock_type track total size automatically
with minor modifications to memblock manipulation functions and remove
requirements on calling memblock_analyze(). [__]memblock_dump_all()
now also dumps the total size of reserved regions.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
---
include/linux/memblock.h | 2 +-
mm/memblock.c | 27 +++++++++++++--------------
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h
index 6ac91c5..5bb1500 100644
--- a/include/linux/memblock.h
+++ b/include/linux/memblock.h
@@ -30,12 +30,12 @@ struct memblock_region {
struct memblock_type {
unsigned long cnt; /* number of regions */
unsigned long max; /* size of the allocated array */
+ phys_addr_t total_size; /* size of all regions */
struct memblock_region *regions;
};
struct memblock {
phys_addr_t current_limit;
- phys_addr_t memory_size; /* Updated by memblock_analyze() */
struct memblock_type memory;
struct memblock_type reserved;
};
diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
index b44875f..f399641 100644
--- a/mm/memblock.c
+++ b/mm/memblock.c
@@ -179,12 +179,14 @@ int __init_memblock memblock_reserve_reserved_regions(void)
static void __init_memblock memblock_remove_region(struct memblock_type *type, unsigned long r)
{
+ type->total_size -= type->regions[r].size;
memmove(&type->regions[r], &type->regions[r + 1],
(type->cnt - (r + 1)) * sizeof(type->regions[r]));
type->cnt--;
/* Special case for empty arrays */
if (type->cnt == 0) {
+ WARN_ON(type->total_size != 0);
type->cnt = 1;
type->regions[0].base = 0;
type->regions[0].size = 0;
@@ -314,6 +316,7 @@ static void __init_memblock memblock_insert_region(struct memblock_type *type,
rgn->size = size;
memblock_set_region_node(rgn, nid);
type->cnt++;
+ type->total_size += size;
}
/**
@@ -340,10 +343,11 @@ static int __init_memblock memblock_add_region(struct memblock_type *type,
/* special case for empty array */
if (type->regions[0].size == 0) {
- WARN_ON(type->cnt != 1);
+ WARN_ON(type->cnt != 1 || type->total_size);
type->regions[0].base = base;
type->regions[0].size = size;
memblock_set_region_node(&type->regions[0], MAX_NUMNODES);
+ type->total_size = size;
return 0;
}
repeat:
@@ -453,7 +457,8 @@ static int __init_memblock memblock_isolate_range(struct memblock_type *type,
* to process the next region - the new top half.
*/
rgn->base = base;
- rgn->size = rend - rgn->base;
+ rgn->size -= base - rbase;
+ type->total_size -= base - rbase;
memblock_insert_region(type, i, rbase, base - rbase,
memblock_get_region_node(rgn));
} else if (rend > end) {
@@ -462,7 +467,8 @@ static int __init_memblock memblock_isolate_range(struct memblock_type *type,
* current region - the new bottom half.
*/
rgn->base = end;
- rgn->size = rend - rgn->base;
+ rgn->size -= end - rbase;
+ type->total_size -= end - rbase;
memblock_insert_region(type, i--, rbase, end - rbase,
memblock_get_region_node(rgn));
} else {
@@ -784,10 +790,9 @@ phys_addr_t __init memblock_alloc_try_nid(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align, i
* Remaining API functions
*/
-/* You must call memblock_analyze() before this. */
phys_addr_t __init memblock_phys_mem_size(void)
{
- return memblock.memory_size;
+ return memblock.memory.total_size;
}
/* lowest address */
@@ -803,7 +808,6 @@ phys_addr_t __init_memblock memblock_end_of_DRAM(void)
return (memblock.memory.regions[idx].base + memblock.memory.regions[idx].size);
}
-/* You must call memblock_analyze() after this. */
void __init memblock_enforce_memory_limit(phys_addr_t limit)
{
unsigned long i;
@@ -906,7 +910,9 @@ static void __init_memblock memblock_dump(struct memblock_type *type, char *name
void __init_memblock __memblock_dump_all(void)
{
pr_info("MEMBLOCK configuration:\n");
- pr_info(" memory size = 0x%llx\n", (unsigned long long)memblock.memory_size);
+ pr_info(" memory size = %#llx reserved size = %#llx\n",
+ (unsigned long long)memblock.memory.total_size,
+ (unsigned long long)memblock.reserved.total_size);
memblock_dump(&memblock.memory, "memory");
memblock_dump(&memblock.reserved, "reserved");
@@ -914,13 +920,6 @@ void __init_memblock __memblock_dump_all(void)
void __init memblock_analyze(void)
{
- int i;
-
- memblock.memory_size = 0;
-
- for (i = 0; i < memblock.memory.cnt; i++)
- memblock.memory_size += memblock.memory.regions[i].size;
-
/* We allow resizing from there */
memblock_can_resize = 1;
}
--
1.7.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-28 19:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-28 19:31 [PATCHSET tip:x86/memblock] memblock: Kill early_node_map[], take 2 Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 01/23] memblock: Fix include breakages caused by 24aa07882b Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 02/23] memblock: Make memblock_{add|remove|free|reserve}() return int and update prototypes Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 03/23] memblock: Use memblock_reserve() in memblock internal functions Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 04/23] memblock: Add __memblock_dump_all() Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 05/23] memblock: Kill sentinel entries at the end of static region arrays Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 06/23] memblock: Kill memblock_init() Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 07/23] memblock: Separate out memblock_isolate_range() from memblock_set_node() Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 08/23] memblock: Reimplement __memblock_remove() using memblock_isolate_range() Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 09/23] memblock: Make memblock functions handle overflowing range @size Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 10/23] memblock: Reimplement memblock_enforce_memory_limit() using __memblock_remove() Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 11/23] powerpc: Cleanup memblock usage Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 13/23] memblock: s/memblock_analyze()/memblock_allow_resize()/ and update users Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 14/23] memblock: Implement memblock_add_node() Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 15/23] powerpc: Use HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 16/23] sparc: " Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 17/23] SuperH: " Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 18/23] ia64: " Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 19/23] mips: " Tejun Heo
2011-12-08 16:19 ` Ralf Baechle
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 20/23] s390: " Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 21/23] score: " Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 22/23] memblock: Kill early_node_map[] Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 23/23] memblock: Reimplement memblock allocation using reverse free area iterator Tejun Heo
2011-12-05 16:31 ` [PATCHSET tip:x86/memblock] memblock: Kill early_node_map[], take 2 Ingo Molnar
2011-12-05 17:12 ` Tejun Heo
2011-12-05 17:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-05 20:26 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-07-26 15:35 [PATCHSET tip:x86/memblock] memblock: Kill early_node_map[] Tejun Heo
2011-07-26 15:35 ` [PATCH 12/23] memblock: Track total size of regions automatically Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1322508685-32532-13-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jonas@southpole.se \
--cc=lennox.wu@gmail.com \
--cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liqin.chen@sunplusct.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox