From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756791Ab1K2VWM (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Nov 2011 16:22:12 -0500 Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.123]:53843 "EHLO hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756501Ab1K2VWL (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Nov 2011 16:22:11 -0500 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=Xd0LPfF5 c=1 sm=0 a=ZycB6UtQUfgMyuk2+PxD7w==:17 a=x9VNfy9Nl58A:10 a=5SG0PmZfjMsA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=18kCY76J9N-rlaogxnQA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=ZycB6UtQUfgMyuk2+PxD7w==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 74.67.80.29 Subject: Re: Perhaps a side effect regarding NMI returns From: Steven Rostedt To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Andi Kleen , LKML , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , "H. Peter Anvin" , Frederic Weisbecker , Thomas Gleixner , Mathieu Desnoyers , Paul Turner In-Reply-To: References: <1322539673.17003.45.camel@frodo> <20111129203111.GQ24062@one.firstfloor.org> <1322600301.17003.84.camel@frodo> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 16:22:09 -0500 Message-ID: <1322601729.17003.86.camel@frodo> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 (2.32.3-1.fc14) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 13:05 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > Too late for 3.2 obviously, since I don't think anybody has actually > reported the "delayed NMI's" as a real problem - so even if it's a > bug, it's not a bug we should try to fix at this stage. Oh no, I had no plans to get this into 3.2. I'm optimistic just to get this into 3.3. Thanks! -- Steve