public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Venki Pallipadi <venki@google.com>,
	Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.jf.intel.com>,
	"Shi, Alex" <alex.shi@intel.com>, PaulTurner <pjt@google.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 3/6] sched, nohz: sched group, domain aware nohz idle load balancing
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 09:36:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1322728611.2921.315.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1322702224.21329.88.camel@sbsiddha-desk.sc.intel.com>

On Wed, 2011-11-30 at 17:17 -0800, Suresh Siddha wrote:

> So was there any discussion regarding restoring the power savings mode
> at the recent scheduler bof? Even in the latest platforms, there is a
> small power savings when we consolidate the two tasks in two sockets
> onto one socket (though the power difference is shrinking). Turbo
> headroom also plays some role in this. Two tasks in two sockets
> potentially have more turbo headroom compared to the two tasks in one
> socket and thus increased performance with increased power.

Right, so if someone is very keen on it they could try now, but
otherwise it'll come once pjt's got his linsched stuff public and we're
going to do the big topology overhaul.

Anyway, for anybody going to work on it, I think the most important
first step is removing those crazy ass {smt,mc}_power knobs and their
multiple values :-)

  reply	other threads:[~2011-12-01  8:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-11-18 23:03 [patch 0/6] sched, nohz: load balancing patches Suresh Siddha
2011-11-18 23:03 ` [patch 1/6] sched, nohz: introduce nohz_flags in the struct rq Suresh Siddha
2011-11-24 10:24   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-11-28 23:59     ` Suresh Siddha
2011-11-29  9:47       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-11-18 23:03 ` [patch 2/6] sched, nohz: track nr_busy_cpus in the sched_group_power Suresh Siddha
2011-11-18 23:03 ` [patch 3/6] sched, nohz: sched group, domain aware nohz idle load balancing Suresh Siddha
2011-11-24 11:47   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-11-28 23:51     ` Suresh Siddha
2011-11-29  9:44       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-01  1:03         ` Suresh Siddha
2011-12-01  1:17         ` Suresh Siddha
2011-12-01  8:36           ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2011-11-24 11:53   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-11-28 23:58     ` Suresh Siddha
2011-11-29  9:45       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-11-18 23:03 ` [patch 4/6] sched, nohz: cleanup the find_new_ilb() using sched groups nr_busy_cpus Suresh Siddha
2011-11-18 23:03 ` [patch 5/6] sched: disable sched feature TTWU_QUEUE by default Suresh Siddha
2011-11-19  4:30   ` Mike Galbraith
2011-11-19  4:41     ` Mike Galbraith
2011-11-18 23:03 ` [patch 6/6] sched: fix the sched group node allocation for SD_OVERLAP domain Suresh Siddha
2011-12-06  9:51   ` [tip:sched/core] sched: Fix the sched group node allocation for SD_OVERLAP domains tip-bot for Suresh Siddha

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1322728611.2921.315.camel@twins \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=alex.shi@intel.com \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=pjt@google.com \
    --cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
    --cc=tim.c.chen@linux.jf.intel.com \
    --cc=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=venki@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox