Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver

Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-12-05T18:15:50Z

On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 19:02, Dave Martin <dave.martin@linaro.org> wrote:
> Unfortunately, NO_IRQ is often not spelled "NO_IRQ".  It looks like the assumption
> "irq < 0 === no irq" may be quite a lot more widespread than "NO_IRQ === no irq".

Can we make irq unsigned, and hope the compiler catches all of them
(comparison always
false blah blah blah)?

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds