Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 11 (mmc)

Randy Dunlap
2011-10-11T18:49:43Z

On 10/11/11 02:11, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The linux-next tree is now available from
> git://github.com/sfrothwell/linux-next.git as a temporary measure while
> the kernel.org servers are unavailable.
>
> It may also turn up on git.kernel.org (depending on the mirroring). The
> patch set is still absent, however.
>
> Changes since 20111007:

When CONFIG_BLOCK is not enabled:

In file included from next-2011-1011/drivers/mmc/card/sdio_uart.c:43:0:
next-2011-1011/include/linux/mmc/card.h:175:12: error: 'DISK_NAME_LEN' undeclared here (not in a function)

Deleting the #include <linux/mmc/card.h> fixes the sdio_uart.c build.
However, the same problem occurs in mmc/core/core.c:

In file included from next-2011-1011/drivers/mmc/core/core.c:30:0:
next-2011-1011/include/linux/mmc/card.h:175:12: error: 'DISK_NAME_LEN' undeclared here (not in a function)

Should mmc/core/ depend on BLOCK? or should it just be made
to build even when BLOCK is not enabled?

--
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***