From: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: "wallak@free.fr" <wallak@free.fr>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ACPI "_PDC" - acpi_processor_set_pdc()- execution regression - Linux-3.x
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2011 15:40:57 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1323330057.27764.14.camel@minggr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAErSpo7Dcxn7tsecDUXe6AQeRAchsU9tQjL7=-WPpPmDj2OUfw@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, 2011-12-08 at 13:01 +0800, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> [+cc linux-acpi and Lin Ming]
>
> On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 3:38 PM, <wallak@free.fr> wrote:
> > We have a regression on the ACPI stack of the last linux kernel line 3.x (3.1.4,
> > 3.2-rc4...). The ACPI "_PDC" chunk is not executed on some computers (e.g. Dell
> > X300; the function acpi_processor_set_pdc() is not called). This issue yield to
> > an uninitialized state of some ACPI variables.
> >
> > A patch is available below. This patch come back to the previous linux behavior,
> > and works fine.
Hi, Wallak
Please attach the acpidump output and kernel .config file.
And also the output of "cat /proc/cpuinfo"
(You can send these files to me offline in case they are too big for
mail list)
Thanks,
Lin Ming
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Wallak.
> >
> > --- linux-3.1.4-mdf/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c.orig 2011-12-07
> > 23:12:57.000000000 +0100
> > +++ linux-3.1.4-mdf/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c 2011-12-07
> > 23:13:39.000000000 +0100
> > @@ -223,8 +223,8 @@
> > type = (acpi_type == ACPI_TYPE_DEVICE) ? 1 : 0;
> > cpuid = acpi_get_cpuid(handle, type, acpi_id);
> >
> > - if (cpuid == -1)
> > - return false;
> > + if ((cpuid == -1) && (num_possible_cpus() > 1))
> > + return false;
> >
> > return true;
> > }
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-08 7:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-07 22:38 ACPI "_PDC" - acpi_processor_set_pdc()- execution regression - Linux-3.x wallak
2011-12-08 5:01 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2011-12-08 7:40 ` Lin Ming [this message]
[not found] ` <CAF1ivSZX37HRyxJX_rdkZ4pVrxjCZeM39mAs4ZKcqWCYShxaxQ@mail.gmail.com>
2011-12-12 2:38 ` Lin Ming
2011-12-12 21:59 ` Wallak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1323330057.27764.14.camel@minggr \
--to=ming.m.lin@intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wallak@free.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox