From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754019Ab1LMKDX (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Dec 2011 05:03:23 -0500 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:60683 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752826Ab1LMKDV convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Dec 2011 05:03:21 -0500 Message-ID: <1323770542.9082.9.camel@twins> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] perf_event: add PERF_COUNT_HW_REF_CPU_CYCLES generic PMU event From: Peter Zijlstra To: Stephane Eranian Cc: Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, acme@infradead.org, robert.richter@amd.com, ming.m.lin@intel.com, andi@firstfloor.org, asharma@fb.com Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 11:02:22 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <1323559734-3488-1-git-send-email-eranian@google.com> <1323559734-3488-3-git-send-email-eranian@google.com> <1323694657.13285.12.camel@twins> <20111212173215.GI23870@elte.hu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.1- Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 22:45 -0800, Stephane Eranian wrote: > Isn't CPU_REF_CYCLES good enough? I was just asking.. someone needs to ;-) Took the remaining patches as well, thanks!