From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752129Ab1LSQvs (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Dec 2011 11:51:48 -0500 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:54570 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751032Ab1LSQvp convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Dec 2011 11:51:45 -0500 Message-ID: <1324313499.24621.18.camel@twins> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/4] sched: Adding gang scheduling infrastrucure From: Peter Zijlstra To: "Nikunj A. Dadhania" Cc: mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com, bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 17:51:39 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1324309904.24621.15.camel@twins> References: <20111219083141.32311.9429.stgit@abhimanyu.in.ibm.com> <20111219083424.32311.23559.stgit@abhimanyu.in.ibm.com> <1324309904.24621.15.camel@twins> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.1- Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2011-12-19 at 16:51 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > + smp_call_function_many(rq->gang_cpumask, > > + gang_sched_member, tg, 0); > > See this is just not going to happen. Furthermore its racy against task_group destruction.