* [PATCH 1/2] security: create task_free security callback
2011-12-21 20:17 [PATCH v10 0/2] security: Yama LSM Kees Cook
@ 2011-12-21 20:17 ` Kees Cook
2011-12-21 20:17 ` [PATCH 2/2] security: Yama LSM Kees Cook
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Kees Cook @ 2011-12-21 20:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Cc: linux-security-module, John Johansen, Roland McGrath,
James Morris, kernel-hardening
The current LSM interface to cred_free is not sufficient for allowing
an LSM to track the life and death of a task. This patch adds the
task_free hook so that an LSM can clean up resources on task death.
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
---
include/linux/security.h | 9 +++++++++
kernel/fork.c | 1 +
security/capability.c | 5 +++++
security/security.c | 5 +++++
4 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/security.h b/include/linux/security.h
index 19d8e04..3fc021d 100644
--- a/include/linux/security.h
+++ b/include/linux/security.h
@@ -650,6 +650,10 @@ static inline void security_free_mnt_opts(struct security_mnt_opts *opts)
* manual page for definitions of the @clone_flags.
* @clone_flags contains the flags indicating what should be shared.
* Return 0 if permission is granted.
+ * @task_free:
+ * @task task being freed
+ * Handle release of task-related resources. (Note that this can be called
+ * from interrupt context.)
* @cred_alloc_blank:
* @cred points to the credentials.
* @gfp indicates the atomicity of any memory allocations.
@@ -1500,6 +1504,7 @@ struct security_operations {
int (*dentry_open) (struct file *file, const struct cred *cred);
int (*task_create) (unsigned long clone_flags);
+ void (*task_free) (struct task_struct *task);
int (*cred_alloc_blank) (struct cred *cred, gfp_t gfp);
void (*cred_free) (struct cred *cred);
int (*cred_prepare)(struct cred *new, const struct cred *old,
@@ -1762,6 +1767,7 @@ int security_file_send_sigiotask(struct task_struct *tsk,
int security_file_receive(struct file *file);
int security_dentry_open(struct file *file, const struct cred *cred);
int security_task_create(unsigned long clone_flags);
+void security_task_free(struct task_struct *task);
int security_cred_alloc_blank(struct cred *cred, gfp_t gfp);
void security_cred_free(struct cred *cred);
int security_prepare_creds(struct cred *new, const struct cred *old, gfp_t gfp);
@@ -2273,6 +2279,9 @@ static inline int security_task_create(unsigned long clone_flags)
return 0;
}
+static inline void security_task_free(struct task_struct *task)
+{ }
+
static inline int security_cred_alloc_blank(struct cred *cred, gfp_t gfp)
{
return 0;
diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
index da4a6a1..d707601 100644
--- a/kernel/fork.c
+++ b/kernel/fork.c
@@ -189,6 +189,7 @@ void __put_task_struct(struct task_struct *tsk)
WARN_ON(atomic_read(&tsk->usage));
WARN_ON(tsk == current);
+ security_task_free(tsk);
exit_creds(tsk);
delayacct_tsk_free(tsk);
put_signal_struct(tsk->signal);
diff --git a/security/capability.c b/security/capability.c
index 2984ea4..26d5ef8 100644
--- a/security/capability.c
+++ b/security/capability.c
@@ -359,6 +359,10 @@ static int cap_task_create(unsigned long clone_flags)
return 0;
}
+static void cap_task_free(struct task_struct *task)
+{
+}
+
static int cap_cred_alloc_blank(struct cred *cred, gfp_t gfp)
{
return 0;
@@ -955,6 +959,7 @@ void __init security_fixup_ops(struct security_operations *ops)
set_to_cap_if_null(ops, file_receive);
set_to_cap_if_null(ops, dentry_open);
set_to_cap_if_null(ops, task_create);
+ set_to_cap_if_null(ops, task_free);
set_to_cap_if_null(ops, cred_alloc_blank);
set_to_cap_if_null(ops, cred_free);
set_to_cap_if_null(ops, cred_prepare);
diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c
index 0c6cc69..49a7227 100644
--- a/security/security.c
+++ b/security/security.c
@@ -749,6 +749,11 @@ int security_task_create(unsigned long clone_flags)
return security_ops->task_create(clone_flags);
}
+void security_task_free(struct task_struct *task)
+{
+ security_ops->task_free(task);
+}
+
int security_cred_alloc_blank(struct cred *cred, gfp_t gfp)
{
return security_ops->cred_alloc_blank(cred, gfp);
--
1.7.0.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [PATCH 2/2] security: Yama LSM
2011-12-21 20:17 [PATCH v10 0/2] security: Yama LSM Kees Cook
2011-12-21 20:17 ` [PATCH 1/2] security: create task_free security callback Kees Cook
@ 2011-12-21 20:17 ` Kees Cook
2011-12-28 12:16 ` [PATCH v10 0/2] " Tetsuo Handa
2012-02-09 22:36 ` James Morris
3 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Kees Cook @ 2011-12-21 20:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Cc: linux-security-module, John Johansen, Roland McGrath,
James Morris, kernel-hardening
This adds the Yama Linux Security Module to collect DAC security
improvements (specifically just ptrace restrictions for now) that have
existed in various forms over the years and have been carried outside the
mainline kernel by other Linux distributions like Openwall and grsecurity.
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Acked-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
---
v10:
- Made some cleanups as suggested by John Johansen.
v9:
- Remove pid_ns feature. Touches too many core kernel areas at the moment.
v8:
- Updated RCU usage and locking, thanks to Mandeep Singh Baines.
v7:
- Merge ptrace restrictions, which include various fixes from
Vasiliy Kulikov, Solar Designer, Ming Lei, Tetsuo Handa, and Eric Paris.
- Merge pid_ns feature from Vasiliy Kulikov.
- Rip out link restrictions for initial upstreaming.
v6:
- Fix interaction with overlayfs, thanks to Andy Whitcroft and Leann
Ogasawara.
- Clarify rationale for LSM.
- Move documentation under security subdirectory.
v5:
- resend, with ptrace relationship interface
v4:
- drop accidentally included fs/exec.c chunk.
v3:
- drop needless cap_ callbacks.
- fix usage of get_task_comm.
- drop CONFIG_ of sysctl defaults, as recommended by Andi Kleen.
- require SYSCTL.
v2:
- add rcu locking, thanks to Tetsuo Handa.
- add Documentation/Yama.txt for summary of features.
---
Documentation/security/00-INDEX | 2 +
Documentation/security/Yama.txt | 60 ++++++++
include/linux/prctl.h | 6 +
security/Kconfig | 6 +
security/Makefile | 2 +
security/yama/Kconfig | 13 ++
security/yama/Makefile | 3 +
security/yama/yama_lsm.c | 319 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
8 files changed, 411 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 Documentation/security/Yama.txt
create mode 100644 security/yama/Kconfig
create mode 100644 security/yama/Makefile
create mode 100644 security/yama/yama_lsm.c
diff --git a/Documentation/security/00-INDEX b/Documentation/security/00-INDEX
index 19bc494..1f33b73 100644
--- a/Documentation/security/00-INDEX
+++ b/Documentation/security/00-INDEX
@@ -4,6 +4,8 @@ SELinux.txt
- how to get started with the SELinux security enhancement.
Smack.txt
- documentation on the Smack Linux Security Module.
+Yama.txt
+ - documentation on the Yama Linux Security Module.
apparmor.txt
- documentation on the AppArmor security extension.
credentials.txt
diff --git a/Documentation/security/Yama.txt b/Documentation/security/Yama.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..4f0b789
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/security/Yama.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
+Yama is a Linux Security Module that collects a number of system-wide DAC
+security protections that are not handled by the core kernel itself. To
+select it at boot time, specify "security=yama" (though this will disable
+any other LSM).
+
+Yama is controlled through sysctl in /proc/sys/kernel/yama:
+
+- ptrace_scope
+
+==============================================================
+
+ptrace_scope:
+
+As Linux grows in popularity, it will become a larger target for
+malware. One particularly troubling weakness of the Linux process
+interfaces is that a single user is able to examine the memory and
+running state of any of their processes. For example, if one application
+(e.g. Pidgin) was compromised, it would be possible for an attacker to
+attach to other running processes (e.g. Firefox, SSH sessions, GPG agent,
+etc) to extract additional credentials and continue to expand the scope
+of their attack without resorting to user-assisted phishing.
+
+This is not a theoretical problem. SSH session hijacking
+(http://www.storm.net.nz/projects/7) and arbitrary code injection
+(http://c-skills.blogspot.com/2007/05/injectso.html) attacks already
+exist and remain possible if ptrace is allowed to operate as before.
+Since ptrace is not commonly used by non-developers and non-admins, system
+builders should be allowed the option to disable this debugging system.
+
+For a solution, some applications use prctl(PR_SET_DUMPABLE, ...) to
+specifically disallow such ptrace attachment (e.g. ssh-agent), but many
+do not. A more general solution is to only allow ptrace directly from a
+parent to a child process (i.e. direct "gdb EXE" and "strace EXE" still
+work), or with CAP_SYS_PTRACE (i.e. "gdb --pid=PID", and "strace -p PID"
+still work as root).
+
+For software that has defined application-specific relationships
+between a debugging process and its inferior (crash handlers, etc),
+prctl(PR_SET_PTRACER, pid, ...) can be used. An inferior can declare which
+other process (and its descendents) are allowed to call PTRACE_ATTACH
+against it. Only one such declared debugging process can exists for
+each inferior at a time. For example, this is used by KDE, Chromium, and
+Firefox's crash handlers, and by Wine for allowing only Wine processes
+to ptrace each other.
+
+0 - classic ptrace permissions: a process can PTRACE_ATTACH to any other
+ process running under the same uid, as long as it is dumpable (i.e.
+ did not transition uids, start privileged, or have called
+ prctl(PR_SET_DUMPABLE...) already).
+
+1 - restricted ptrace: a process must have a predefined relationship
+ with the inferior it wants to call PTRACE_ATTACH on. By default,
+ this relationship is that of only its descendants when the above
+ classic criteria is also met. To change the relationship, an
+ inferior can call prctl(PR_SET_PTRACER, debugger, ...) to declare
+ an allowed debugger PID to call PTRACE_ATTACH on the inferior.
+
+The original children-only logic was based on the restrictions in grsecurity.
+
+==============================================================
diff --git a/include/linux/prctl.h b/include/linux/prctl.h
index a3baeb2..dc71db0 100644
--- a/include/linux/prctl.h
+++ b/include/linux/prctl.h
@@ -102,4 +102,10 @@
#define PR_MCE_KILL_GET 34
+/*
+ * Set specific pid that is allowed to ptrace the current task.
+ * A value of 0 mean "no process".
+ */
+#define PR_SET_PTRACER 0x59616d61
+
#endif /* _LINUX_PRCTL_H */
diff --git a/security/Kconfig b/security/Kconfig
index 51bd5a0..ccc61f8 100644
--- a/security/Kconfig
+++ b/security/Kconfig
@@ -187,6 +187,7 @@ source security/selinux/Kconfig
source security/smack/Kconfig
source security/tomoyo/Kconfig
source security/apparmor/Kconfig
+source security/yama/Kconfig
source security/integrity/Kconfig
@@ -196,6 +197,7 @@ choice
default DEFAULT_SECURITY_SMACK if SECURITY_SMACK
default DEFAULT_SECURITY_TOMOYO if SECURITY_TOMOYO
default DEFAULT_SECURITY_APPARMOR if SECURITY_APPARMOR
+ default DEFAULT_SECURITY_YAMA if SECURITY_YAMA
default DEFAULT_SECURITY_DAC
help
@@ -214,6 +216,9 @@ choice
config DEFAULT_SECURITY_APPARMOR
bool "AppArmor" if SECURITY_APPARMOR=y
+ config DEFAULT_SECURITY_YAMA
+ bool "Yama" if SECURITY_YAMA=y
+
config DEFAULT_SECURITY_DAC
bool "Unix Discretionary Access Controls"
@@ -225,6 +230,7 @@ config DEFAULT_SECURITY
default "smack" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_SMACK
default "tomoyo" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_TOMOYO
default "apparmor" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_APPARMOR
+ default "yama" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_YAMA
default "" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_DAC
endmenu
diff --git a/security/Makefile b/security/Makefile
index a5e502f..c26c81e 100644
--- a/security/Makefile
+++ b/security/Makefile
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ subdir-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX) += selinux
subdir-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_SMACK) += smack
subdir-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_TOMOYO) += tomoyo
subdir-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_APPARMOR) += apparmor
+subdir-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_YAMA) += yama
# always enable default capabilities
obj-y += commoncap.o
@@ -21,6 +22,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_SMACK) += smack/built-in.o
obj-$(CONFIG_AUDIT) += lsm_audit.o
obj-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_TOMOYO) += tomoyo/built-in.o
obj-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_APPARMOR) += apparmor/built-in.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_YAMA) += yama/built-in.o
obj-$(CONFIG_CGROUP_DEVICE) += device_cgroup.o
# Object integrity file lists
diff --git a/security/yama/Kconfig b/security/yama/Kconfig
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..51d6709
--- /dev/null
+++ b/security/yama/Kconfig
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+config SECURITY_YAMA
+ bool "Yama support"
+ depends on SECURITY
+ select SECURITYFS
+ select SECURITY_PATH
+ default n
+ help
+ This selects Yama, which extends DAC support with additional
+ system-wide security settings beyond regular Linux discretionary
+ access controls. Currently available is ptrace scope restriction.
+ Further information can be found in Documentation/security/Yama.txt.
+
+ If you are unsure how to answer this question, answer N.
diff --git a/security/yama/Makefile b/security/yama/Makefile
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..8b5e065
--- /dev/null
+++ b/security/yama/Makefile
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+obj-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_YAMA) := yama.o
+
+yama-y := yama_lsm.o
diff --git a/security/yama/yama_lsm.c b/security/yama/yama_lsm.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..dd4d360
--- /dev/null
+++ b/security/yama/yama_lsm.c
@@ -0,0 +1,319 @@
+/*
+ * Yama Linux Security Module
+ *
+ * Author: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2010 Canonical, Ltd.
+ * Copyright (C) 2011 The Chromium OS Authors.
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2, as
+ * published by the Free Software Foundation.
+ *
+ */
+
+#include <linux/security.h>
+#include <linux/sysctl.h>
+#include <linux/ptrace.h>
+#include <linux/prctl.h>
+#include <linux/ratelimit.h>
+
+static int ptrace_scope = 1;
+
+/* describe a ptrace relationship for potential exception */
+struct ptrace_relation {
+ struct task_struct *tracer;
+ struct task_struct *tracee;
+ struct list_head node;
+};
+
+static LIST_HEAD(ptracer_relations);
+static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(ptracer_relations_lock);
+
+/**
+ * yama_ptracer_add - add/replace an exception for this tracer/tracee pair
+ * @tracer: the task_struct of the process doing the ptrace
+ * @tracee: the task_struct of the process to be ptraced
+ *
+ * Each tracee can have, at most, one tracer registered. Each time this
+ * is called, the prior registered tracer will be replaced for the tracee.
+ *
+ * Returns 0 if relationship was added, -ve on error.
+ */
+static int yama_ptracer_add(struct task_struct *tracer,
+ struct task_struct *tracee)
+{
+ int rc = 0;
+ struct ptrace_relation *added;
+ struct ptrace_relation *entry, *relation = NULL;
+
+ added = kmalloc(sizeof(*added), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!added)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ spin_lock_bh(&ptracer_relations_lock);
+ list_for_each_entry(entry, &ptracer_relations, node)
+ if (entry->tracee == tracee) {
+ relation = entry;
+ break;
+ }
+ if (!relation) {
+ relation = added;
+ relation->tracee = tracee;
+ list_add(&relation->node, &ptracer_relations);
+ }
+ relation->tracer = tracer;
+
+ spin_unlock_bh(&ptracer_relations_lock);
+ if (added != relation)
+ kfree(added);
+
+ return rc;
+}
+
+/**
+ * yama_ptracer_del - remove exceptions related to the given tasks
+ * @tracer: remove any relation where tracer task matches
+ * @tracee: remove any relation where tracee task matches
+ */
+static void yama_ptracer_del(struct task_struct *tracer,
+ struct task_struct *tracee)
+{
+ struct ptrace_relation *relation, *safe;
+
+ spin_lock_bh(&ptracer_relations_lock);
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(relation, safe, &ptracer_relations, node)
+ if (relation->tracee == tracee ||
+ relation->tracer == tracer) {
+ list_del(&relation->node);
+ kfree(relation);
+ }
+ spin_unlock_bh(&ptracer_relations_lock);
+}
+
+/**
+ * yama_task_free - check for task_pid to remove from exception list
+ * @task: task being removed
+ */
+static void yama_task_free(struct task_struct *task)
+{
+ yama_ptracer_del(task, task);
+}
+
+/**
+ * yama_task_prctl - check for Yama-specific prctl operations
+ * @option: operation
+ * @arg2: argument
+ * @arg3: argument
+ * @arg4: argument
+ * @arg5: argument
+ *
+ * Return 0 on success, -ve on error. -ENOSYS is returned when Yama
+ * does not handle the given option.
+ */
+static int yama_task_prctl(int option, unsigned long arg2, unsigned long arg3,
+ unsigned long arg4, unsigned long arg5)
+{
+ int rc;
+ struct task_struct *myself = current;
+
+ rc = cap_task_prctl(option, arg2, arg3, arg4, arg5);
+ if (rc != -ENOSYS)
+ return rc;
+
+ switch (option) {
+ case PR_SET_PTRACER:
+ /* Since a thread can call prctl(), find the group leader
+ * before calling _add() or _del() on it, since we want
+ * process-level granularity of control. The tracer group
+ * leader checking is handled later when walking the ancestry
+ * at the time of PTRACE_ATTACH check.
+ */
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ if (!thread_group_leader(myself))
+ myself = rcu_dereference(myself->group_leader);
+ get_task_struct(myself);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+
+ if (arg2 == 0) {
+ yama_ptracer_del(NULL, myself);
+ rc = 0;
+ } else {
+ struct task_struct *tracer;
+
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ tracer = find_task_by_vpid(arg2);
+ if (tracer)
+ get_task_struct(tracer);
+ else
+ rc = -EINVAL;
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+
+ if (tracer) {
+ rc = yama_ptracer_add(tracer, myself);
+ put_task_struct(tracer);
+ }
+ }
+
+ put_task_struct(myself);
+ break;
+ }
+
+ return rc;
+}
+
+/**
+ * task_is_descendant - walk up a process family tree looking for a match
+ * @parent: the process to compare against while walking up from child
+ * @child: the process to start from while looking upwards for parent
+ *
+ * Returns 1 if child is a descendant of parent, 0 if not.
+ */
+static int task_is_descendant(struct task_struct *parent,
+ struct task_struct *child)
+{
+ int rc = 0;
+ struct task_struct *walker = child;
+
+ if (!parent || !child)
+ return 0;
+
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ if (!thread_group_leader(parent))
+ parent = rcu_dereference(parent->group_leader);
+ while (walker->pid > 0) {
+ if (!thread_group_leader(walker))
+ walker = rcu_dereference(walker->group_leader);
+ if (walker == parent) {
+ rc = 1;
+ break;
+ }
+ walker = rcu_dereference(walker->real_parent);
+ }
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+
+ return rc;
+}
+
+/**
+ * ptracer_exception_found - tracer registered as exception for this tracee
+ * @tracer: the task_struct of the process attempting ptrace
+ * @tracee: the task_struct of the process to be ptraced
+ *
+ * Returns 1 if tracer has is ptracer exception ancestor for tracee.
+ */
+static int ptracer_exception_found(struct task_struct *tracer,
+ struct task_struct *tracee)
+{
+ int rc = 0;
+ struct ptrace_relation *relation;
+ struct task_struct *parent = NULL;
+
+ spin_lock_bh(&ptracer_relations_lock);
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ if (!thread_group_leader(tracee))
+ tracee = rcu_dereference(tracee->group_leader);
+ list_for_each_entry(relation, &ptracer_relations, node)
+ if (relation->tracee == tracee) {
+ parent = relation->tracer;
+ break;
+ }
+
+ if (task_is_descendant(parent, tracer))
+ rc = 1;
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ spin_unlock_bh(&ptracer_relations_lock);
+
+ return rc;
+}
+
+/**
+ * yama_ptrace_access_check - validate PTRACE_ATTACH calls
+ * @child: task that current task is attempting to ptrace
+ * @mode: ptrace attach mode
+ *
+ * Returns 0 if following the ptrace is allowed, -ve on error.
+ */
+static int yama_ptrace_access_check(struct task_struct *child,
+ unsigned int mode)
+{
+ int rc;
+
+ /* If standard caps disallows it, so does Yama. We should
+ * only tighten restrictions further.
+ */
+ rc = cap_ptrace_access_check(child, mode);
+ if (rc)
+ return rc;
+
+ /* require ptrace target be a child of ptracer on attach */
+ if (mode == PTRACE_MODE_ATTACH &&
+ ptrace_scope &&
+ !task_is_descendant(current, child) &&
+ !ptracer_exception_found(current, child) &&
+ !capable(CAP_SYS_PTRACE))
+ rc = -EPERM;
+
+ if (rc) {
+ char name[sizeof(current->comm)];
+ printk_ratelimited(KERN_NOTICE "ptrace of non-child"
+ " pid %d was attempted by: %s (pid %d)\n",
+ child->pid,
+ get_task_comm(name, current),
+ current->pid);
+ }
+
+ return rc;
+}
+
+static struct security_operations yama_ops = {
+ .name = "yama",
+
+ .ptrace_access_check = yama_ptrace_access_check,
+ .task_prctl = yama_task_prctl,
+ .task_free = yama_task_free,
+};
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL
+static int zero;
+static int one = 1;
+
+struct ctl_path yama_sysctl_path[] = {
+ { .procname = "kernel", },
+ { .procname = "yama", },
+ { }
+};
+
+static struct ctl_table yama_sysctl_table[] = {
+ {
+ .procname = "ptrace_scope",
+ .data = &ptrace_scope,
+ .maxlen = sizeof(int),
+ .mode = 0644,
+ .proc_handler = proc_dointvec_minmax,
+ .extra1 = &zero,
+ .extra2 = &one,
+ },
+ { }
+};
+#endif /* CONFIG_SYSCTL */
+
+static __init int yama_init(void)
+{
+ if (!security_module_enable(&yama_ops))
+ return 0;
+
+ printk(KERN_INFO "Yama: becoming mindful.\n");
+
+ if (register_security(&yama_ops))
+ panic("Yama: kernel registration failed.\n");
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL
+ if (!register_sysctl_paths(yama_sysctl_path, yama_sysctl_table))
+ panic("Yama: sysctl registration failed.\n");
+#endif
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+security_initcall(yama_init);
--
1.7.0.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread