From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org,
haiyangz@microsoft.com, hjanssen@microsoft.com,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
Jorge Bastos <mysql.jorge@decimal.pt>,
Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>, Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
Subject: Re: Reiserfs.c bug in 3.2-rc5
Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2012 13:45:11 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1325616312.2095.26.camel@falcor> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFzwq6XiAnX26uV+-mNsbGbnj0S=4nP5avPqKPw8OT+cmw@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 2012-01-03 at 08:48 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > Commit fb88c2b changed the security_old_inode_init_security() return
> > code for S_PRIVATE inodes. As long as -EOPNOTSUPP is expected, probably
> > should revert that as well.
> >
> > (I'm cc'ing the ocfs2 maintainers.)
>
> Jan, Joel? Can you confirm? I was planning on doing 3.2 today, but
> maybe I can't, or maybe we need to punt this to be a stable patch.
>
> But maybe we can have quick testing and agreement? Does everybody
> agree on both Honza's patch *and* revert of fb88c2b? Does the
> EOPNOTSUPP return case match what we used to do?
>
> Linus
>
Just clarifying not all of commit fb88c2b, but only the
security_old_inode_init_security() hunk.
Mimi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-03 18:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-10 23:48 Reiserfs.c bug in 3.2-rc5 Jorge Bastos
2011-12-13 18:07 ` Jan Kara
2011-12-24 11:55 ` Jorge Bastos
2012-01-02 11:52 ` Jan Kara
[not found] ` <005301ccc998$201c9da0$6055d8e0$@jorge@decimal.pt>
2012-01-03 1:08 ` Jan Kara
[not found] ` <000701ccc9fa$74df73f0$5e9e5bd0$@jorge@decimal.pt>
2012-01-03 12:38 ` Jan Kara
2012-01-03 15:25 ` Mimi Zohar
2012-01-03 16:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-03 18:45 ` Mimi Zohar [this message]
2012-01-03 19:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-03 22:28 ` Mimi Zohar
2012-01-03 23:47 ` James Morris
2012-01-04 0:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-04 1:02 ` James Morris
2012-01-04 17:15 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1325616312.2095.26.camel@falcor \
--to=zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
--cc=hjanssen@microsoft.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jlbec@evilplan.org \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mfasheh@suse.com \
--cc=mysql.jorge@decimal.pt \
--cc=reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox