From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1754690Ab2ACSsJ (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 3 Jan 2012 13:48:09 -0500
Received: from e9.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.139]:45468 "EHLO e9.ny.us.ibm.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1754589Ab2ACSsH (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 3 Jan 2012 13:48:07 -0500
Subject: Re: Reiserfs.c bug in 3.2-rc5
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org, haiyangz@microsoft.com,
        hjanssen@microsoft.com, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
        James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
        Jorge Bastos <mysql.jorge@decimal.pt>, Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>,
        Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2012 13:45:11 -0500
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFzwq6XiAnX26uV+-mNsbGbnj0S=4nP5avPqKPw8OT+cmw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <43556.213.228.140.150.1323560920.squirrel@webmail.decimal.pt>
	 <20111213180707.GI11747@quack.suse.cz>
	 <!&!AAAAAAAAAAAYAAAAAAAAAKCACr8ZwetPrGXZsycJodKihAAAEAAAAGPJDX4w3wxIo8Onu2+q/xMBAAAAAA==@decimal.pt>
	 <20120102115222.GA3626@quack.suse.cz> <20120103010826.GF3626@quack.suse.cz>
	 <20120103123841.GA31457@quack.suse.cz> <1325604356.2095.23.camel@falcor>
	 <CA+55aFzwq6XiAnX26uV+-mNsbGbnj0S=4nP5avPqKPw8OT+cmw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.0.3 (3.0.3-1.fc15) 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <1325616312.2095.26.camel@falcor>
Mime-Version: 1.0
x-cbid: 12010318-7182-0000-0000-0000007BE2B5
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, 2012-01-03 at 08:48 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > Commit fb88c2b changed the security_old_inode_init_security() return
> > code for S_PRIVATE inodes. As long as -EOPNOTSUPP is expected, probably
> > should revert that as well.
> >
> > (I'm cc'ing the ocfs2 maintainers.)
> 
> Jan, Joel? Can you confirm? I was planning on doing 3.2 today, but
> maybe I can't, or maybe we need to punt this to be a stable patch.
> 
> But maybe we can have quick testing and agreement? Does everybody
> agree on both Honza's patch *and* revert of fb88c2b? Does the
> EOPNOTSUPP return case match what we used to do?
> 
>                           Linus
> 

Just clarifying not all of commit fb88c2b, but only the
security_old_inode_init_security() hunk.

Mimi