From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752755Ab2AWJPl (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jan 2012 04:15:41 -0500 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:53164 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750893Ab2AWJPk convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jan 2012 04:15:40 -0500 Message-ID: <1327310131.2446.1.camel@twins> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] ARM: Remove the __ARCH_WANT_INTERRUPTS_ON_CTXSW definition From: Peter Zijlstra To: Catalin Marinas Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Russell King , Ingo Molnar Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 10:15:31 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1327081352-13178-1-git-send-email-catalin.marinas@arm.com> References: <1327081352-13178-1-git-send-email-catalin.marinas@arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.1- Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 17:42 +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote: > Hi, > > This is version 3 of the set of patches removing > __ARCH_WANT_INTERRUPTS_ON_CTXSW on ARM. The series was rebased on top of > 3.3-rc1 and fixed the conflicts with the kernel/sched/ changes and the > ARM LPAE patches. There are no functional changes from v2. I plan to > push this to -next and get it ready for 3.4-rc1. > > Question for Peter/Ingo - how do we merge the first patch that > introduces finish_arch_post_lock_switch? Do you pick it up or I can > merge it via rmk (with your ack)? I'm fine either way, I'll probably ask Ingo to pull your tree so that I can stack some other patches on top.