From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755202Ab2AaUD2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:03:28 -0500 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:41764 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753710Ab2AaUD1 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:03:27 -0500 Message-ID: <1328040199.2446.243.camel@twins> Subject: RE: [PATCH] scheduler: domain: init next_balance in nohz_idle_balancer with jiffies From: Peter Zijlstra To: Diwakar Tundlam Cc: Peter De Schrijver , Ingo Molnar , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "'Kamalesh Babulal'" Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 21:03:19 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1DD7BFEDD3147247B1355BEFEFE466523791832BE8@HQMAIL04.nvidia.com> References: <1327927463-4165-1-git-send-email-pdeschrijver@nvidia.com> <1328024684.2446.234.camel@twins> <1DD7BFEDD3147247B1355BEFEFE466523791832BE8@HQMAIL04.nvidia.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.1- Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 11:18 -0800, Diwakar Tundlam wrote: > Yes, the change should be ported to kernel/sched/fair.c under > init_sched_fair_class(). But that's for 3.3. I will send a separate > patch for 3.3 shortly. > Patches are sent against the current (3.3-rc) or next (3.4) development trees, anything older can possibly get backports through the stable stuff but is completely irrelevant for patch submission.