From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755575Ab2BAA0S (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Jan 2012 19:26:18 -0500 Received: from perches-mx.perches.com ([206.117.179.246]:52818 "EHLO labridge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752050Ab2BAA0R (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Jan 2012 19:26:17 -0500 Message-ID: <1328055976.14714.7.camel@joe2Laptop> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] coda: Remove unnecessary OOM messages From: Joe Perches To: Ryan Mallon Cc: Jan Harkes , coda@cs.cmu.edu, codalist@TELEMANN.coda.cs.cmu.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 16:26:16 -0800 In-Reply-To: <4F2885EC.8070900@gmail.com> References: <4F288178.4040405@gmail.com> <1328055665.14714.5.camel@joe2Laptop> <4F2885EC.8070900@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2012-02-01 at 11:23 +1100, Ryan Mallon wrote: > On 01/02/12 11:21, Joe Perches wrote: > > Maybe because alloc/free functions are > > used relatively infrequently, maybe it'd > > be better to not declare the functions > > inline but add them to coda_linux.c > Sure, either approach is fine. Do you want to add the patch to your series? I think Jan can work it out properly if he wants it.