From: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
Cc: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
emunson@mgebm.net, imunsie@au1.ibm.com, eranian@google.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf annotate: Numeric assembly labels cause incorrect annotation
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:10:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1328782223.9303.3.camel@marge.simpson.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120207144033.GB2172@infradead.org>
On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 12:40 -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 02:55:35PM +1100, Anton Blanchard escreveu:
> >
> > A perf annotate of a kernel function written in assembly shows
> > very strange percentages:
>
> Thanks! I think this is the same problem Mike Galbraith noticed and
> reported me (I guess that was in a private message), Mike, can you
> please test it so that I can add more Foo-by stamps to this one?
Sorry for the slow response (bz bz).
I don't see that problem, but perf top annotation isn't working properly
in tip at least. It seems to have forgotten how to average, seems to be
clearing hit counts at every screen refresh or something.
-Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-09 10:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-07 3:55 [PATCH] perf annotate: Numeric assembly labels cause incorrect annotation Anton Blanchard
2012-02-07 14:25 ` Eric B Munson
2012-02-07 14:40 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2012-02-09 10:10 ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
2012-02-09 13:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-02-09 14:50 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-02-09 15:50 ` Mike Galbraith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1328782223.9303.3.camel@marge.simpson.net \
--to=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=emunson@mgebm.net \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=imunsie@au1.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox