linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>,
	Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/5] ptrace: make PTRACE_SEIZE set ptrace options specified in 'data' parameter
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:36:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1328891809-21245-1-git-send-email-vda.linux@googlemail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120210155753.GA25923@redhat.com>

This can be used to close a few corner cases in strace where we get
unwanted racy behavior after attach, but before we have a chance
to set options (the notorious post-execve SIGTRAP comes to mind),
and removes the need to track "did we set opts for this task" state
in strace internals.

While we are at it:

Make it possible to extend SEIZE in the future with more functionality
by passing non-zero 'addr' parameter.
To that end, error out if 'addr' is non-zero.
PTRACE_ATTACH did not (and still does not) have such check,
and users (strace) do pass garbage there... let's avoid repeating
this mistake with SEIZE.

Set all task->ptrace bits in one operation - before this change,
we were adding PT_SEIZED and PT_PTRACE_CAP with task->ptrace |= BIT ops.
This was probably ok (not a bug), but let's be on a safer side.

Changes in v2: update ptrace_attach() call in compat_sys_ptrace() too.

Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/ptrace.c |   31 +++++++++++++++++++++----------
 1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/ptrace.c b/kernel/ptrace.c
index 9acd07a..4661c5b 100644
--- a/kernel/ptrace.c
+++ b/kernel/ptrace.c
@@ -231,6 +231,7 @@ bool ptrace_may_access(struct task_struct *task, unsigned int mode)
 }
 
 static int ptrace_attach(struct task_struct *task, long request,
+			 unsigned long addr,
 			 unsigned long flags)
 {
 	bool seize = (request == PTRACE_SEIZE);
@@ -238,19 +239,29 @@ static int ptrace_attach(struct task_struct *task, long request,
 
 	/*
 	 * SEIZE will enable new ptrace behaviors which will be implemented
-	 * gradually.  SEIZE_DEVEL is used to prevent applications
+	 * gradually.  SEIZE_DEVEL bit is used to prevent applications
 	 * expecting full SEIZE behaviors trapping on kernel commits which
 	 * are still in the process of implementing them.
 	 *
 	 * Only test programs for new ptrace behaviors being implemented
 	 * should set SEIZE_DEVEL.  If unset, SEIZE will fail with -EIO.
 	 *
-	 * Once SEIZE behaviors are completely implemented, this flag and
-	 * the following test will be removed.
+	 * Once SEIZE behaviors are completely implemented, this flag
+	 * will be removed.
 	 */
 	retval = -EIO;
-	if (seize && !(flags & PTRACE_SEIZE_DEVEL))
-		goto out;
+	if (seize) {
+		if (addr != 0)
+			goto out;
+		if (!(flags & PTRACE_SEIZE_DEVEL))
+			goto out;
+		flags &= ~(unsigned long)PTRACE_SEIZE_DEVEL;
+		if (flags & ~(unsigned long)PTRACE_O_MASK)
+			goto out;
+		flags = PT_PTRACED | PT_SEIZED | (flags << PT_OPT_FLAG_SHIFT);
+	} else {
+		flags = PT_PTRACED;
+	}
 
 	audit_ptrace(task);
 
@@ -282,11 +293,11 @@ static int ptrace_attach(struct task_struct *task, long request,
 	if (task->ptrace)
 		goto unlock_tasklist;
 
-	task->ptrace = PT_PTRACED;
 	if (seize)
-		task->ptrace |= PT_SEIZED;
+		flags |= PT_SEIZED;
 	if (ns_capable(task_user_ns(task), CAP_SYS_PTRACE))
-		task->ptrace |= PT_PTRACE_CAP;
+		flags |= PT_PTRACE_CAP;
+	task->ptrace = flags;
 
 	__ptrace_link(task, current);
 
@@ -879,7 +890,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE4(ptrace, long, request, long, pid, unsigned long, addr,
 	}
 
 	if (request == PTRACE_ATTACH || request == PTRACE_SEIZE) {
-		ret = ptrace_attach(child, request, data);
+		ret = ptrace_attach(child, request, addr, data);
 		/*
 		 * Some architectures need to do book-keeping after
 		 * a ptrace attach.
@@ -1022,7 +1033,7 @@ asmlinkage long compat_sys_ptrace(compat_long_t request, compat_long_t pid,
 	}
 
 	if (request == PTRACE_ATTACH || request == PTRACE_SEIZE) {
-		ret = ptrace_attach(child, request, data);
+		ret = ptrace_attach(child, request, addr, data);
 		/*
 		 * Some architectures need to do book-keeping after
 		 * a ptrace attach.
-- 
1.7.7.6


  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-02-10 16:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-02-10 14:43 [PATCH 0/5] ptrace tweaks Denys Vlasenko
2012-02-10 14:43 ` [PATCH 1/5] ptrace: don't modify flags on PTRACE_SETOPTIONS failure Denys Vlasenko
2012-02-10 14:43   ` [PATCH 2/5] ptrace: simplify PTRACE_foo constants and PTRACE_SETOPTIONS code Denys Vlasenko
2012-02-10 14:43     ` [PATCH 3/5] ptrace: make PTRACE_SEIZE set ptrace options specified in 'data' parameter Denys Vlasenko
2012-02-10 14:43       ` [PATCH 4/5] ptrace: renumber PTRACE_EVENT_STOP so that future new options and events can match Denys Vlasenko
2012-02-10 14:43         ` [PATCH 5/5] ptrace: remove PTRACE_SEIZE_DEVEL bit Denys Vlasenko
2012-02-10 17:24           ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-02-10 17:46             ` Pedro Alves
2012-02-10 17:42               ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-02-10 17:49                 ` Pedro Alves
2012-02-10 19:21             ` Tejun Heo
2012-02-10 17:19         ` [PATCH 4/5] ptrace: renumber PTRACE_EVENT_STOP so that future new options and events can match Oleg Nesterov
2012-02-10 15:57       ` [PATCH 3/5] ptrace: make PTRACE_SEIZE set ptrace options specified in 'data' parameter Oleg Nesterov
2012-02-10 16:34         ` Denys Vlasenko
2012-02-10 16:36         ` Denys Vlasenko [this message]
2012-02-10 17:20           ` [PATCH v2 " Oleg Nesterov
2012-02-10 17:17     ` [PATCH 2/5] ptrace: simplify PTRACE_foo constants and PTRACE_SETOPTIONS code Oleg Nesterov
2012-02-10 17:17   ` [PATCH 1/5] ptrace: don't modify flags on PTRACE_SETOPTIONS failure Oleg Nesterov
2012-02-10 17:32 ` [PATCH 0/2] more tweaks (Was: ptrace tweaks) Oleg Nesterov
2012-02-10 17:32   ` [PATCH 1/2] ptrace: the killed tracee should not enter the syscall Oleg Nesterov
2012-02-10 17:33   ` [PATCH 2/2] ptrace: don't send SIGTRAP on exec if SEIZED Oleg Nesterov
2012-02-10 17:48   ` [PATCH 0/2] more tweaks (Was: ptrace tweaks) Pedro Alves

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1328891809-21245-1-git-send-email-vda.linux@googlemail.com \
    --to=vda.linux@googlemail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=palves@redhat.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).