From: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
Eugeni Dodonov <eugeni.dodonov@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: Reduce the number of retries whilst reading EDIDs
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 10:17:35 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1330096655.26569.22.camel@atropine> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFyAUgY5BBLA+eVF4bFTFkooxQneKE-0BWy1nrjUni=vxg@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 995 bytes --]
On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 12:15 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Btw, clearly X does *not* cache the EDID results, at least not for
> this case. So the explicit xrandr example is probably pretty close to
> what wine does. Maybe the proper fix is to just make X.org force
> caching when clients do this (because it's definitely X that does the
> drm_mode_getconnector() thing - xrandr itself spends zero time on
> this, it just does an X request and waits for the result).
RANDR exposes two requests here for a reason. We used to only have
RRGetScreenResources which always pulled data afresh. We added
RRGetScreenResourcesCurrent to get the cached version. If you want
xrandr(1) to use the latter say xrandr --current. Arguably xrandr
should do things the other way around and require you to say --reprobe
or something.
Even then, the kernel should cache if it can. And any competent
hardware has plug interrupts on DP and DVI, so we really should get this
right.
- ajax
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-24 15:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-23 16:30 responsiveness: newer kernels causing lagging and blocking Stephan Bärwolf
2012-02-23 17:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-23 17:26 ` Stephan Bärwolf
2012-02-23 17:21 ` Chris Wilson
2012-02-23 17:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-23 17:31 ` Dave Airlie
2012-02-23 18:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-23 19:52 ` [PATCH] drm: Reduce the number of retries whilst reading EDIDs Chris Wilson
2012-02-23 20:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-23 20:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-23 21:36 ` Eugeni Dodonov
2012-02-23 21:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-24 15:17 ` Adam Jackson [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1330096655.26569.22.camel@atropine \
--to=ajax@redhat.com \
--cc=airlied@redhat.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=eugeni.dodonov@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox