From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Vince Weaver <vweaver1@eecs.utk.edu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf_event use rdpmc rather than rdmsr when possible in kernel
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 12:39:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1330342762.11248.69.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1202201722120.2753@cl320.eecs.utk.edu>
On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 17:38 -0500, Vince Weaver wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
> index 5adce10..5550047 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
> @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ u64 x86_perf_event_update(struct perf_event *event)
> */
> again:
> prev_raw_count = local64_read(&hwc->prev_count);
> - rdmsrl(hwc->event_base, new_raw_count);
> + new_raw_count=native_read_pmc(hwc->event_base_rdpmc);
That really wants to be rdpmc(), bypassing paravirt like that isn't
nice.
>
> if (local64_cmpxchg(&hwc->prev_count, prev_raw_count,
> new_raw_count) != prev_raw_count)
> @@ -768,9 +768,11 @@ static inline void x86_assign_hw_event(struct perf_event *event,
> } else if (hwc->idx >= X86_PMC_IDX_FIXED) {
> hwc->config_base = MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_FIXED_CTR_CTRL;
> hwc->event_base = MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_FIXED_CTR0 + (hwc->idx - X86_PMC_IDX_FIXED);
> + hwc->event_base_rdpmc = (hwc->idx - X86_PMC_IDX_FIXED) | 1<<30;
> } else {
> hwc->config_base = x86_pmu_config_addr(hwc->idx);
> hwc->event_base = x86_pmu_event_addr(hwc->idx);
> + hwc->event_base_rdpmc = x86_pmu_addr_offset(hwc->idx);
> }
> }
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
> index abb2776..432ac69 100644
> --- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
> +++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
> @@ -562,6 +562,7 @@ struct hw_perf_event {
> u64 last_tag;
> unsigned long config_base;
> unsigned long event_base;
> + unsigned long event_base_rdpmc;
We could make that unsigned int, the SDM explicitly states
rdmsr/wrmsr/rdpmc take ECX (and ignore the upper 32bits RCX).
> int idx;
> int last_cpu;
> struct hw_perf_event_extra extra_reg;
But yeah, avoiding the extra variable will add a conditional and extra
instructions to the rdpmc path.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-27 11:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-20 22:38 [PATCH] perf_event use rdpmc rather than rdmsr when possible in kernel Vince Weaver
2012-02-27 11:39 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2012-02-27 16:06 ` Vince Weaver
2012-02-27 16:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-27 17:04 ` Vince Weaver
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-03-01 22:28 Vince Weaver
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1330342762.11248.69.camel@twins \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
--cc=eranian@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=vweaver1@eecs.utk.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox