From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>,
containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>,
Lennart Poettering <lennart@poettering.net>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFD] cgroup: about multiple hierarchies
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 22:53:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1330466039.11248.103.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120228213526.GI9920@redhat.com>
On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 16:35 -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> Yes this is how scheduler does to handle hierarchy. Treat task and group
> at same level.
...
> Whether it is a good thing or bad thing, I don't know.
That's IMO what the cgroupfs interface provides for, if you do anything
different there's this shadow group that contains the tasks for which
you then have to provide extra parameter control.
Furthermore, by treating tasks and groups at the same level you can
create the extra group, but you can't do the reverse. So its the more
versatile solution as well.
> I think previous
> design was allocating a group for every user. I guess, in that case we
> will have fixed % share of each user (until and unless users are created/
> removed).
Not even, it depended on if the user had anything runnable or not. It
was very much like the current cgroup stuff if you create a cgroup for
each user and stick the tasks in.
The cpu-cgroup stuff is purely runnable based, so every wakeup/sleep
changes the entire weight distribution, yay! :-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-28 21:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 84+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-21 21:19 [RFD] cgroup: about multiple hierarchies Tejun Heo
2012-02-21 21:21 ` Tejun Heo
2012-02-22 13:34 ` Glauber Costa
2012-02-23 7:45 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2012-02-23 17:29 ` Tejun Heo
2012-02-23 18:47 ` Serge Hallyn
2012-02-26 4:59 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-02-22 13:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-22 13:37 ` Glauber Costa
2012-02-22 18:01 ` Tejun Heo
2012-02-23 7:39 ` Li Zefan
2012-02-22 15:45 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-02-22 18:22 ` Tejun Heo
2012-02-27 17:46 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-02-22 16:38 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-02-22 16:57 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-02-22 18:43 ` Tejun Heo
2012-02-23 9:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-23 14:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-01 17:19 ` Michal Schmidt
2012-03-01 18:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-02 11:08 ` Michal Schmidt
2012-03-02 11:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-02 11:28 ` Michal Schmidt
2012-03-02 11:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-01 20:26 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-03-01 21:02 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-03-01 22:04 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-03-01 22:38 ` C Anthony Risinger
2012-03-02 10:51 ` Michal Schmidt
2012-03-02 11:52 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-03-05 12:43 ` Lennart Poettering
2012-03-05 15:47 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-03-05 19:58 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-03-02 2:43 ` Kay Sievers
2012-03-02 10:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-02 11:16 ` Michal Schmidt
2012-03-02 11:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-23 21:38 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-02-23 22:34 ` Tejun Heo
2012-02-28 21:16 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-02-28 21:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-28 21:35 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-02-28 21:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-28 21:54 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-02-28 22:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-28 22:31 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-02-28 21:53 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2012-02-28 22:09 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-02-24 11:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-22 18:33 ` Tejun Heo
2012-02-23 19:41 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-02-23 22:38 ` Tejun Heo
2012-02-23 7:59 ` Li Zefan
2012-02-23 20:32 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-02-23 8:22 ` Li Zefan
2012-02-23 17:33 ` Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <m162em2efy.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>
2012-03-03 14:26 ` Serge Hallyn
2012-03-05 11:37 ` Lennart Poettering
2012-03-12 22:10 ` Tejun Heo
2012-03-12 22:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-12 22:28 ` Tejun Heo
2012-03-12 22:31 ` Lennart Poettering
2012-03-12 23:00 ` Tejun Heo
2012-03-12 23:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-12 23:09 ` Tejun Heo
2012-03-12 23:43 ` Lennart Poettering
2012-03-12 22:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-12 22:39 ` Tejun Heo
2012-03-12 22:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-12 23:04 ` Tejun Heo
2012-03-13 14:10 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-03-13 16:11 ` C Anthony Risinger
2012-03-13 16:30 ` C Anthony Risinger
2012-03-13 17:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-13 17:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-13 10:11 ` Glauber Costa
2012-03-13 14:03 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-03-13 15:59 ` Tejun Heo
2012-03-16 23:14 ` James Bottomley
2012-03-12 22:37 ` Serge Hallyn
2012-03-12 22:55 ` Tejun Heo
2012-03-13 13:49 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-03-13 16:02 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1330466039.11248.103.camel@twins \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
--cc=lennart@poettering.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).