From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932380Ab2CBLXf (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Mar 2012 06:23:35 -0500 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:45033 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932307Ab2CBLXe convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Mar 2012 06:23:34 -0500 Message-ID: <1330687394.11248.222.camel@twins> Subject: Re: [RFD] cgroup: about multiple hierarchies From: Peter Zijlstra To: Michal Schmidt Cc: Vivek Goyal , Tejun Heo , Li Zefan , containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Kay Sievers , Lennart Poettering , Frederic Weisbecker , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 12:23:14 +0100 In-Reply-To: <4F50AA22.9080007@redhat.com> References: <20120221211938.GE12236@google.com> <20120222163858.GB4128@redhat.com> <20120222165714.GC4128@redhat.com> <1329990094.24994.64.camel@twins> <1330006399.11248.20.camel@twins> <4F4FAF89.3090706@redhat.com> <1330624986.11248.209.camel@twins> <4F50AA22.9080007@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2- Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2012-03-02 at 12:08 +0100, Michal Schmidt wrote: > And what exactly do you mean by booting? Obviously not booting into a > full desktop environment, because that requires a lot of features. Nah, who needs that stuff anyway :-) Note that even my desktop and laptop work fine without initrd, systemd and CONFIG_CGROUP nonsense. And while they are bloated with useless crap like *Kit and others, simply because I can't get myself to rebuild enough to get rid of the dependencies, I utterly hate them being around. > If on the other hand you are satisfied with booting into a getty with > not many services around, in this sense systemd will boot without > CONFIG_CGROUPS. Except that it waits a random amount of time, long enough for me to think the machine didn't come back up and power cycle again. The random delay is _waay_ longer than a regular reboot cycle and totally destroys the usability. > It's recommended not to do that and nobody actively > tests this setup, but at least systemd will not abort. So it can be used > to check if the kernel boots and to run some tests. So you don't recommend people use server type setups? Quality engineering that!