From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932110Ab2CELMG (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Mar 2012 06:12:06 -0500 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:55696 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756825Ab2CELL5 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Mar 2012 06:11:57 -0500 Message-ID: <1330945883.11248.239.camel@twins> Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf report: auto-detect branch stack sampling mode From: Peter Zijlstra To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Stephane Eranian , David Ahern , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ravitillo@lbl.gov, khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com, asharma@fb.com, robert.richter@amd.com, ming.m.lin@intel.com, vweaver1@eecs.utk.edu, andi@firstfloor.org Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 12:11:23 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20120305104933.GD18556@elte.hu> References: <20120224094048.GA7952@quad> <4F47ABAD.9080408@gmail.com> <4F47AD6A.6080609@gmail.com> <4F47B1A3.6050503@gmail.com> <20120302190822.GA12431@infradead.org> <20120303194346.GB22044@infradead.org> <20120305104933.GD18556@elte.hu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2- Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 11:49 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > > Em Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 04:08:22PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu: > > > Em Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 06:47:38PM +0100, Stephane Eranian escreveu: > > > > Arnaldo, > > > > > > > > What do you think about this patch? > > > > > > I'm processing perf/core patches today, will get to this one and merge > > > or let you know objections, > > > > Ingo, > > > > What is the status of merging > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/peterz/queue.git;a=summary ? > > > > After that I can try merging Stephane's autho-detect patch, > > I guess I'll get this from Peter soonish? > > I think it would be nice to have the tooling patches in the same > queue as well, so that I can try it all out as one package > before pushing it. Hmm,. I somehow thought you already had it since you complained about that record vs report thing. Lemme resurrect that series then.. :/