* [PATCH] x86, tsc: Skip refined tsc calibration on systems with reliable TSC.
[not found] <1329876964.10380.28.camel@ank32.eng.vmware.com>
@ 2012-02-22 2:19 ` Alok Kataria
2012-02-28 19:09 ` Alok Kataria
2012-03-07 1:32 ` john stultz
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Alok Kataria @ 2012-02-22 2:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: John Stultz
Cc: Thomas Gleixner, the arch/x86 maintainers, dirk.brandewie, alan,
stable, Dan Hecht, LKML
[Oops forgot to copy LKML, now it is, sorry for the duplicates]
While running the latest Linux as guest under VMware in highly
over-committed situations, we have seen cases when the refined TSC
algorithm fails to get a valid tsc_start value in
tsc_refine_calibration_work from multiple attempts. As a result the
kernel keeps on scheduling the tsc_irqwork task for later. Subsequently
after several attempts when it gets a valid start value it goes through
the refined calibration and either bails out or uses the new results.
Given that the kernel originally read the TSC frequency from the
platform, which is the best it can get, I don't think there is much
value in refining it.
So IMO, for systems which get the TSC frequency from the platform we
should skip the refined tsc algorithm.
We can use the TSC_RELIABLE cpu cap flag to detect this, right now it is
set only on VMware and for Moorestown Penwell both of which have there
own TSC calibration methods.
Thanks,
Alok
--
From: Alok N Kataria <akataria@vmware.com>
For systems which get the TSC frequency directly from the platform
and don't go through the native TSC calibration algorithm, we should
trust those values and not try to refine those.
This patch is applicable for kernel from v2.6.38 to current mainline.
Signed-off-by: Alok N Kataria <akataria@vmware.com>
Cc: John Stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Dirk Brandewie <dirk.brandewie@gmail.com>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c 2012-02-21 17:31:01.000000000 -0800
+++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c 2012-02-21 17:39:05.000000000 -0800
@@ -874,6 +874,13 @@ static void tsc_refine_calibration_work(
goto out;
/*
+ * Trust the results of the earlier calibration on systems
+ * exporting a reliable TSC.
+ */
+ if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_TSC_RELIABLE))
+ goto out;
+
+ /*
* Since the work is started early in boot, we may be
* delayed the first time we expire. So set the workqueue
* again once we know timers are working.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] x86, tsc: Skip refined tsc calibration on systems with reliable TSC.
2012-02-22 2:19 ` [PATCH] x86, tsc: Skip refined tsc calibration on systems with reliable TSC Alok Kataria
@ 2012-02-28 19:09 ` Alok Kataria
2012-03-07 1:32 ` john stultz
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Alok Kataria @ 2012-02-28 19:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: John Stultz
Cc: Thomas Gleixner, the arch/x86 maintainers, dirk.brandewie, alan,
stable, Dan Hecht, LKML
Ping...any comments on this one.
Thanks,
Alok
On Tue, 2012-02-21 at 18:19 -0800, Alok Kataria wrote:
> [Oops forgot to copy LKML, now it is, sorry for the duplicates]
>
> While running the latest Linux as guest under VMware in highly
> over-committed situations, we have seen cases when the refined TSC
> algorithm fails to get a valid tsc_start value in
> tsc_refine_calibration_work from multiple attempts. As a result the
> kernel keeps on scheduling the tsc_irqwork task for later. Subsequently
> after several attempts when it gets a valid start value it goes through
> the refined calibration and either bails out or uses the new results.
> Given that the kernel originally read the TSC frequency from the
> platform, which is the best it can get, I don't think there is much
> value in refining it.
>
> So IMO, for systems which get the TSC frequency from the platform we
> should skip the refined tsc algorithm.
>
> We can use the TSC_RELIABLE cpu cap flag to detect this, right now it is
> set only on VMware and for Moorestown Penwell both of which have there
> own TSC calibration methods.
>
> Thanks,
> Alok
>
> --
>
> From: Alok N Kataria <akataria@vmware.com>
>
> For systems which get the TSC frequency directly from the platform
> and don't go through the native TSC calibration algorithm, we should
> trust those values and not try to refine those.
>
> This patch is applicable for kernel from v2.6.38 to current mainline.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alok N Kataria <akataria@vmware.com>
> Cc: John Stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
> Cc: Dirk Brandewie <dirk.brandewie@gmail.com>
> Cc: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: stable@kernel.org
>
>
> Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c 2012-02-21 17:31:01.000000000 -0800
> +++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c 2012-02-21 17:39:05.000000000 -0800
> @@ -874,6 +874,13 @@ static void tsc_refine_calibration_work(
> goto out;
>
> /*
> + * Trust the results of the earlier calibration on systems
> + * exporting a reliable TSC.
> + */
> + if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_TSC_RELIABLE))
> + goto out;
> +
> + /*
> * Since the work is started early in boot, we may be
> * delayed the first time we expire. So set the workqueue
> * again once we know timers are working.
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] x86, tsc: Skip refined tsc calibration on systems with reliable TSC.
2012-02-22 2:19 ` [PATCH] x86, tsc: Skip refined tsc calibration on systems with reliable TSC Alok Kataria
2012-02-28 19:09 ` Alok Kataria
@ 2012-03-07 1:32 ` john stultz
2012-03-07 2:05 ` Alok Kataria
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: john stultz @ 2012-03-07 1:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alok Kataria
Cc: Thomas Gleixner, the arch/x86 maintainers, dirk.brandewie, alan,
stable, Dan Hecht, LKML
On Tue, 2012-02-21 at 18:19 -0800, Alok Kataria wrote:
> [Oops forgot to copy LKML, now it is, sorry for the duplicates]
>
> While running the latest Linux as guest under VMware in highly
> over-committed situations, we have seen cases when the refined TSC
> algorithm fails to get a valid tsc_start value in
> tsc_refine_calibration_work from multiple attempts. As a result the
> kernel keeps on scheduling the tsc_irqwork task for later. Subsequently
> after several attempts when it gets a valid start value it goes through
> the refined calibration and either bails out or uses the new results.
> Given that the kernel originally read the TSC frequency from the
> platform, which is the best it can get, I don't think there is much
> value in refining it.
>
> So IMO, for systems which get the TSC frequency from the platform we
> should skip the refined tsc algorithm.
>
> We can use the TSC_RELIABLE cpu cap flag to detect this, right now it is
> set only on VMware and for Moorestown Penwell both of which have there
> own TSC calibration methods.
So this looks ok to me, only one nit below...
>
> Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c 2012-02-21 17:31:01.000000000 -0800
> +++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c 2012-02-21 17:39:05.000000000 -0800
> @@ -874,6 +874,13 @@ static void tsc_refine_calibration_work(
> goto out;
>
> /*
> + * Trust the results of the earlier calibration on systems
> + * exporting a reliable TSC.
> + */
> + if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_TSC_RELIABLE))
> + goto out;
> +
> + /*
Instead of dropping out in the function called by the work-queue, why
not just avoid scheduling the work-queue to begin with?
The FEATURE_TSC_RELIABLE isn't something that is set late, and needs the
delay, right?
Here's what I queued up, let me know if it looks ok to you and I'll push
it on to Thomas.
thanks
-john
>From 50cd62f326fa3204763717c9808bdc29ba10512c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alok Kataria <akataria@vmware.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 18:19:55 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] x86, tsc: Skip refined tsc calibration on systems with reliable TSC.
While running the latest Linux as guest under VMware in highly
over-committed situations, we have seen cases when the refined TSC
algorithm fails to get a valid tsc_start value in
tsc_refine_calibration_work from multiple attempts. As a result the
kernel keeps on scheduling the tsc_irqwork task for later. Subsequently
after several attempts when it gets a valid start value it goes through
the refined calibration and either bails out or uses the new results.
Given that the kernel originally read the TSC frequency from the
platform, which is the best it can get, I don't think there is much
value in refining it.
So for systems which get the TSC frequency from the platform we
should skip the refined tsc algorithm.
We can use the TSC_RELIABLE cpu cap flag to detect this, right now it is
set only on VMware and for Moorestown Penwell both of which have there
own TSC calibration methods.
Signed-off-by: Alok N Kataria <akataria@vmware.com>
Cc: John Stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Dirk Brandewie <dirk.brandewie@gmail.com>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
[jstultz: Reworked to simply not schedule the refining work,
rather then scheduling the work and bombing out later]
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
---
arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c | 8 ++++++++
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
index a62c201..b7d4d33 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
@@ -932,6 +932,14 @@ static int __init init_tsc_clocksource(void)
clocksource_tsc.rating = 0;
clocksource_tsc.flags &= ~CLOCK_SOURCE_IS_CONTINUOUS;
}
+
+ /*
+ * Trust the results of the earlier calibration on systems
+ * exporting a reliable TSC.
+ */
+ if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_TSC_RELIABLE))
+ return 0;
+
schedule_delayed_work(&tsc_irqwork, 0);
return 0;
}
--
1.7.3.2.146.gca209
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] x86, tsc: Skip refined tsc calibration on systems with reliable TSC.
2012-03-07 1:32 ` john stultz
@ 2012-03-07 2:05 ` Alok Kataria
2012-03-07 3:26 ` john stultz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Alok Kataria @ 2012-03-07 2:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: john stultz
Cc: Thomas Gleixner, the arch/x86 maintainers, dirk.brandewie, alan,
stable, Dan Hecht, LKML
Hi John,
On Tue, 2012-03-06 at 17:32 -0800, john stultz wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-02-21 at 18:19 -0800, Alok Kataria wrote:
> > [Oops forgot to copy LKML, now it is, sorry for the duplicates]
> >
> > While running the latest Linux as guest under VMware in highly
> > over-committed situations, we have seen cases when the refined TSC
> > algorithm fails to get a valid tsc_start value in
> > tsc_refine_calibration_work from multiple attempts. As a result the
> > kernel keeps on scheduling the tsc_irqwork task for later. Subsequently
> > after several attempts when it gets a valid start value it goes through
> > the refined calibration and either bails out or uses the new results.
> > Given that the kernel originally read the TSC frequency from the
> > platform, which is the best it can get, I don't think there is much
> > value in refining it.
> >
> > So IMO, for systems which get the TSC frequency from the platform we
> > should skip the refined tsc algorithm.
> >
> > We can use the TSC_RELIABLE cpu cap flag to detect this, right now it is
> > set only on VMware and for Moorestown Penwell both of which have there
> > own TSC calibration methods.
>
> So this looks ok to me, only one nit below...
>
> >
> > Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c 2012-02-21 17:31:01.000000000 -0800
> > +++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c 2012-02-21 17:39:05.000000000 -0800
> > @@ -874,6 +874,13 @@ static void tsc_refine_calibration_work(
> > goto out;
> >
> > /*
> > + * Trust the results of the earlier calibration on systems
> > + * exporting a reliable TSC.
> > + */
> > + if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_TSC_RELIABLE))
> > + goto out;
> > +
> > + /*
>
> Instead of dropping out in the function called by the work-queue, why
> not just avoid scheduling the work-queue to begin with?
>
> The FEATURE_TSC_RELIABLE isn't something that is set late, and needs the
> delay, right?
Right, but the reason I did it as part of work-queue was because on the
"out" path it still registered the tsc clocksource for us, the patch you
suggested doesn't do that. Please find below a patch on similar lines,
which registers the clocksource on RELIABLE_TSC systems, instead of
relying on irq_work to do that.
> Here's what I queued up, let me know if it looks ok to you and I'll push
> it on to Thomas.
>
> thanks
> -john
>
> From 50cd62f326fa3204763717c9808bdc29ba10512c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Alok Kataria <akataria@vmware.com>
> Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 18:19:55 -0800
> Subject: [PATCH] x86, tsc: Skip refined tsc calibration on systems with reliable TSC.
>
> While running the latest Linux as guest under VMware in highly
> over-committed situations, we have seen cases when the refined TSC
> algorithm fails to get a valid tsc_start value in
> tsc_refine_calibration_work from multiple attempts. As a result the
> kernel keeps on scheduling the tsc_irqwork task for later. Subsequently
> after several attempts when it gets a valid start value it goes through
> the refined calibration and either bails out or uses the new results.
> Given that the kernel originally read the TSC frequency from the
> platform, which is the best it can get, I don't think there is much
> value in refining it.
>
> So for systems which get the TSC frequency from the platform we
> should skip the refined tsc algorithm.
>
> We can use the TSC_RELIABLE cpu cap flag to detect this, right now it is
> set only on VMware and for Moorestown Penwell both of which have there
> own TSC calibration methods.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alok N Kataria <akataria@vmware.com>
> Cc: John Stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
> Cc: Dirk Brandewie <dirk.brandewie@gmail.com>
> Cc: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: stable@kernel.org
> [jstultz: Reworked to simply not schedule the refining work,
> rather then scheduling the work and bombing out later]
> Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c | 8 ++++++++
> 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
> index a62c201..b7d4d33 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
> @@ -932,6 +932,14 @@ static int __init init_tsc_clocksource(void)
> clocksource_tsc.rating = 0;
> clocksource_tsc.flags &= ~CLOCK_SOURCE_IS_CONTINUOUS;
> }
> +
> + /*
> + * Trust the results of the earlier calibration on systems
> + * exporting a reliable TSC.
> + */
> + if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_TSC_RELIABLE))
> + return 0;
> +
> schedule_delayed_work(&tsc_irqwork, 0);
> return 0;
> }
Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c 2012-02-21 17:25:35.000000000 -0800
+++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c 2012-03-06 17:56:00.000000000 -0800
@@ -938,6 +938,16 @@ static int __init init_tsc_clocksource(v
clocksource_tsc.rating = 0;
clocksource_tsc.flags &= ~CLOCK_SOURCE_IS_CONTINUOUS;
}
+
+ /*
+ * Trust the results of the earlier calibration on systems
+ * exporting a reliable TSC.
+ */
+ if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_TSC_RELIABLE)) {
+ clocksource_register_khz(&clocksource_tsc, tsc_khz);
+ return 0;
+ }
+
schedule_delayed_work(&tsc_irqwork, 0);
return 0;
}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] x86, tsc: Skip refined tsc calibration on systems with reliable TSC.
2012-03-07 2:05 ` Alok Kataria
@ 2012-03-07 3:26 ` john stultz
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: john stultz @ 2012-03-07 3:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alok Kataria
Cc: Thomas Gleixner, the arch/x86 maintainers, dirk.brandewie, alan,
stable, Dan Hecht, LKML
On Tue, 2012-03-06 at 18:05 -0800, Alok Kataria wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> On Tue, 2012-03-06 at 17:32 -0800, john stultz wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-02-21 at 18:19 -0800, Alok Kataria wrote:
> > > [Oops forgot to copy LKML, now it is, sorry for the duplicates]
> > >
> > > While running the latest Linux as guest under VMware in highly
> > > over-committed situations, we have seen cases when the refined TSC
> > > algorithm fails to get a valid tsc_start value in
> > > tsc_refine_calibration_work from multiple attempts. As a result the
> > > kernel keeps on scheduling the tsc_irqwork task for later. Subsequently
> > > after several attempts when it gets a valid start value it goes through
> > > the refined calibration and either bails out or uses the new results.
> > > Given that the kernel originally read the TSC frequency from the
> > > platform, which is the best it can get, I don't think there is much
> > > value in refining it.
> > >
> > > So IMO, for systems which get the TSC frequency from the platform we
> > > should skip the refined tsc algorithm.
> > >
> > > We can use the TSC_RELIABLE cpu cap flag to detect this, right now it is
> > > set only on VMware and for Moorestown Penwell both of which have there
> > > own TSC calibration methods.
> >
> > So this looks ok to me, only one nit below...
> >
> > >
> > > Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
> > > ===================================================================
> > > --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c 2012-02-21 17:31:01.000000000 -0800
> > > +++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c 2012-02-21 17:39:05.000000000 -0800
> > > @@ -874,6 +874,13 @@ static void tsc_refine_calibration_work(
> > > goto out;
> > >
> > > /*
> > > + * Trust the results of the earlier calibration on systems
> > > + * exporting a reliable TSC.
> > > + */
> > > + if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_TSC_RELIABLE))
> > > + goto out;
> > > +
> > > + /*
> >
> > Instead of dropping out in the function called by the work-queue, why
> > not just avoid scheduling the work-queue to begin with?
> >
> > The FEATURE_TSC_RELIABLE isn't something that is set late, and needs the
> > delay, right?
>
> Right, but the reason I did it as part of work-queue was because on the
> "out" path it still registered the tsc clocksource for us, the patch you
> suggested doesn't do that. Please find below a patch on similar lines,
> which registers the clocksource on RELIABLE_TSC systems, instead of
> relying on irq_work to do that.
Ah, yes. Thanks for pointing that out!
I'll go ahead and queue your revision.
thanks
-john
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-03-07 3:26 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <1329876964.10380.28.camel@ank32.eng.vmware.com>
2012-02-22 2:19 ` [PATCH] x86, tsc: Skip refined tsc calibration on systems with reliable TSC Alok Kataria
2012-02-28 19:09 ` Alok Kataria
2012-03-07 1:32 ` john stultz
2012-03-07 2:05 ` Alok Kataria
2012-03-07 3:26 ` john stultz
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).