From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759491Ab2CGQb7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Mar 2012 11:31:59 -0500 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:57696 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756553Ab2CGQb5 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Mar 2012 11:31:57 -0500 Message-ID: <1331137905.11248.355.camel@twins> Subject: Re: runnable tasks never making it to a runqueue where they can run? From: Peter Zijlstra To: Roland Dreier Cc: LKML Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 17:31:45 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2- Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2012-03-06 at 18:19 -0800, Roland Dreier wrote: > 6,7,8,10,18,19,22 but never onto 23 > (Interestingly, those 8 CPUs seem to form a domain) That would be 'interesting'... I have a similar wsm box and you should have a domain setup like: 0-5,12-17 (node 0) 6-11,18-23 (node 1) Where the first set (0-5 & 6-11) is smt0 and the second set (12-17 & 18-23) smt1. Can you boot with sched_debug and send me both /proc/cpuinfo and dmesg?