From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755813Ab2CNOGS (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Mar 2012 10:06:18 -0400 Received: from perches-mx.perches.com ([206.117.179.246]:38871 "EHLO labridge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753797Ab2CNOGR (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Mar 2012 10:06:17 -0400 Message-ID: <1331733975.27389.80.camel@joe2Laptop> Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: Suggest pr_ over printk(KERN_ From: Joe Perches To: "Ted Ts'o" Cc: Andrew Morton , Andy Whitcroft , LKML Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 07:06:15 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20120314134520.GA26524@thunk.org> References: <20120314003157.GA15379@thunk.org> <1331686026.24613.6.camel@joe2Laptop> <20120314010701.GB15379@thunk.org> <1331687831.27389.2.camel@joe2Laptop> <20120314021938.GD15379@thunk.org> <1331692311.27389.27.camel@joe2Laptop> <20120314024104.GE15379@thunk.org> <1331694074.27389.42.camel@joe2Laptop> <20120314123429.GG15379@thunk.org> <1331730336.27389.70.camel@joe2Laptop> <20120314134520.GA26524@thunk.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 08:34 -0400, Ted Ts'o wrote: > Look, the reason why I care about patch noise is because I have a huge > patch backlog. Take a look at this: > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-ext4/list/ On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 09:45 -0400, Ted Ts'o wrote: > On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 06:05:36AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > > If you actually use patchwork, though it seems you don't, > > I think you should just mark every patch that's new as > > rejected and start over. > I use it, but not in the way you think I should be using it. Given the information in the link you sent, it's not possible for anyone but you to assess your patch backlog. cheers, Joe