RE: [PATCH RFC 2/4] regulator: Rework s5m8767_set_voltage to support both LDOs and BUCKs

Sangbeom Kim
2012-04-03T05:40:51Z

On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 1:24 PM, Axel Lin wrote:
> s5m8767_set_voltage not only implement set_voltage callbacks for LDOs,
> but also for BUCKs when s5m8767->buck_gpioindex is not set.
> s5m8767_set_voltage_buck actually only for buck[2|3|4] when
> s5m8767->buck_gpioindex is set.
> Conditionally calling s5m8767_set_voltage in s5m8767_set_voltage_buck makes
> the code hard to read.
>
> I think merging s5m8767_set_voltage_buck and s5m8767_set_voltage actually
> simplifies things. It's easy to use buck234_vol pointer to differentiate if
> we need to control voltage for buck[2|3|4] by DVS GPIOs.
>
> This patch reworks s5m8767_set_voltage to support both LDOx and BUCKx in all
> cases.
>
> Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>

Acked-by: Sangbeom Kim <sbkim73@samsung.com>

Thanks,
Sangbeom.