From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932124Ab2CSEZs (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Mar 2012 00:25:48 -0400 Received: from perches-mx.perches.com ([206.117.179.246]:44245 "EHLO labridge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754108Ab2CSEZj (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Mar 2012 00:25:39 -0400 Message-ID: <1332131137.23125.44.camel@joe2Laptop> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] ext4: Use pr_fmt and pr_ From: Joe Perches To: "Ted Ts'o" Cc: Andreas Dilger , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2012 21:25:37 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20120319040950.GG31682@thunk.org> References: <20120319040950.GG31682@thunk.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2012-03-19 at 00:09 -0400, Ted Ts'o wrote: > One evidence that this patch is noise is that it doesn't apply cleanly > just on top of my current patch set that I plan to send to Linus. That's crap for evidence. It's more evident that you don't make public your own internal patch queue quickly enough than anything else.