Re: [RFC][PATCH 14/26] sched, numa: Numa balancer

Rik van Riel
2012-07-08T18:36:11Z

On 03/16/2012 10:40 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

+static bool can_move_ne(struct numa_entity *ne)
+{
+ /*
+ * XXX: consider mems_allowed, stinking cpusets has mems_allowed
+ * per task and it can actually differ over a whole process, la-la-la.
+ */
+ return true;
+}

This looks like something that should be fixed before the
code is submitted for merging upstream.

--
All rights reversed