From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030624Ab2CSNaJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:30:09 -0400 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:38632 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757738Ab2CSNaH convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:30:07 -0400 Message-ID: <1332163776.18960.337.camel@twins> Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 00/26] sched/numa From: Peter Zijlstra To: Andrea Arcangeli Cc: Avi Kivity , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Paul Turner , Suresh Siddha , Mike Galbraith , "Paul E. McKenney" , Lai Jiangshan , Dan Smith , Bharata B Rao , Lee Schermerhorn , Rik van Riel , Johannes Weiner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 14:29:36 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20120319130401.GI24602@redhat.com> References: <20120316144028.036474157@chello.nl> <4F670325.7080700@redhat.com> <1332155527.18960.292.camel@twins> <20120319130401.GI24602@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2- Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2012-03-19 at 14:04 +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > For the niche there's the > numactl, cpusets, and all sort of bindings already. No need of more > niche, that is pure kernel API pollution in my view, the niche has all > its hard tools it needs already. Not quite, I've heard that some HPC people would very much like to relax some of that hard binding because its just as big a pain for them as it is for kvm.