From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755676Ab2CTSpH (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Mar 2012 14:45:07 -0400 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:36978 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750831Ab2CTSpF convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Mar 2012 14:45:05 -0400 Message-ID: <1332269081.18960.444.camel@twins> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] perf, tool: Add new event group management From: Peter Zijlstra To: Jiri Olsa Cc: acme@redhat.com, mingo@elte.hu, paulus@samba.org, cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 19:44:41 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1332267341-26338-4-git-send-email-jolsa@redhat.com> References: <1332267341-26338-1-git-send-email-jolsa@redhat.com> <1332267341-26338-4-git-send-email-jolsa@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2- Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 19:15 +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote: > Examples (first event in brackets is group leader): > > # 1 group (cpu-clock,task-clock) > perf record --group -e cpu-clock,task-clock ls > perf record --group parsed -e cpu-clock,task-clock ls > > # 2 groups (cpu-clock,task-clock) (minor-faults,major-faults) > perf record --group parsed -e cpu-clock,task-clock \ > -e minor-faults,major-faults ls > > # 1 group (cpu-clock,task-clock,minor-faults,major-faults) > perf record --group -e cpu-clock,task-clock \ > -e minor-faults,major-faults ls > > # 2 groups (cpu-clock,task-clock) (minor-faults,major-faults) > perf record --group parsed -e cpu-clock,task-clock \ > -e minor-faults,major-faults -e instructions ls > > # 1 group (cpu-clock,task-clock,minor-faults,major-faults,instructions) > perf record --group -e cpu-clock,task-clock \ > -e minor-faults,major-faults -e instructions ls I can't help but dislike the --group/--group parsed thing... How about something like: event_group = "{", events, "}" , [ ":", event_group_mod ] Such that you can write things like: perf record -e "{cpu-clock,cache-misses,cache-references}" perf stat -e "{cpu-clock,cycles},{cpu-clock,cache-misses,cache-references}" perf stat -e "{cpu-clock,cycles}" -e "{cpu-clock,cache-misses,cache-references}" I'm not sure what the current behaviour of --group is, if you create a group like this, do they all sample? If so, we need some option like: perf record -e "{cpu-clock,cache-misses,cache-references}:1" to mean, only sample on cpu-clock but use PERF_SAMPLE_READ and PERF_FORMAT_GROUP to read all siblings on every cpu-clock sample. Now the disadvantage is that {} needs quotes on bash, the advantage is that its completely natural on how to construct groups, without weird --group/--group parsed. Also it provides a place for group modifiers.