linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
	Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
	Milton Miller <miltonm@bga.com>, "mingo@elte.hu" <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux PM mailing list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: CPU Hotplug rework
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 15:38:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1332769098.16159.111.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1332767386.23924.75.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>

On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 09:09 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 10:02 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 11:11 +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > > Obviously, having callbacks hanging around until the CPU comes back is
> > > not viable, nor is blocking preempt during the callbacks.  Calling
> > > get_online_cpus() is too heavy. 
> > 
> > -rt has patches (albeit somewhat ugly) to make get_online_cpus() a br
> > style rw-lock. 
> 
> Unfortunately, -rt still has broken cpu hotplug.

This is still the issue where we take the hotplug lock for write, but
then rely on other threads to complete -- say CPU_DOWN_PREPARE notifiers
doing flush_workqueue(), and the worker kthread needing to acquire the
hotplug lock for read, right?

Yes, that is bothersome, but doesn't hinder the work required to get
get_online_cpus() usably fast, right?

  reply	other threads:[~2012-03-26 13:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-03-19 14:44 CPU Hotplug rework Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-03-19 14:48 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-03-20 11:28   ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-05 17:39   ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-04-05 17:55     ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-04-05 23:06       ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-04-06 20:15         ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-04-09 16:46           ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-04-10  7:56             ` Nikunj A Dadhania
2012-04-06 19:52     ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-04-09 17:13       ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-04-10 13:41         ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-04-10 15:46           ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-04-10 17:26             ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-04-11  0:09       ` Steven Rostedt
2012-04-11  0:28         ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-04-11  0:37           ` Steven Rostedt
2012-04-11  1:00             ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-04-11  6:02               ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-04-11 12:28                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-03-19 23:42 ` Rusty Russell
2012-03-20 10:42   ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-20 23:00     ` Rusty Russell
2012-03-21  9:01       ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-22  4:25         ` Rusty Russell
2012-03-22 22:49           ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-03-23 23:27             ` Rusty Russell
2012-03-24  0:23               ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-03-26  0:41                 ` Rusty Russell
2012-03-26  8:02                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-26 13:09                     ` Steven Rostedt
2012-03-26 13:38                       ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2012-03-26 15:22                         ` Steven Rostedt
2012-03-26 16:13                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-26 17:05                             ` Steven Rostedt
2012-03-26 17:59                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-27  1:32                               ` Rusty Russell
2012-03-27  3:05                                 ` Steven Rostedt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1332769098.16159.111.camel@twins \
    --to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miltonm@bga.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).