From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933811Ab2C2UHH (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Mar 2012 16:07:07 -0400 Received: from perches-mx.perches.com ([206.117.179.246]:60235 "EHLO labridge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933798Ab2C2UG5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Mar 2012 16:06:57 -0400 Message-ID: <1333051616.15602.23.camel@joe2Laptop> Subject: Re: [PATCH] percpu: use KERN_CONT in pcpu_dump_alloc_info() From: Joe Perches To: Tejun Heo Cc: Christoph Lameter , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kay Sievers Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 13:06:56 -0700 In-Reply-To: References: <20120329164842.GE28941@google.com> <1333044612.15602.4.camel@joe2Laptop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2012-03-29 at 12:51 -0700, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, Joe. Hello Tejun. > On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Joe Perches wrote: > > Perhaps it's better to try to print lines > > in fewer printks? Maybe use a line buffer? > What practical difference would that make? It'd be just for avoidance of any other possible interleaving from other threads. It's an __init function so that's not too likely, but if it every happens...