From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934662Ab2C3UpP (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Mar 2012 16:45:15 -0400 Received: from beauty.rexursive.com ([150.101.121.179]:36381 "EHLO beauty.rexursive.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933127Ab2C3UpN (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Mar 2012 16:45:13 -0400 Message-ID: <1333140310.2058.16.camel@shrek.rexursive.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v7]: Hibernation: lower/better control the amount of pages used for buffering From: Bojan Smojver To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linux PM mailing list Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 07:45:10 +1100 In-Reply-To: <201203302137.37731.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <1332891672.2040.24.camel@shrek.rexursive.com> <201203282329.11086.rjw@sisk.pl> <1333071789.2058.2.camel@shrek.rexursive.com> <201203302137.37731.rjw@sisk.pl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3 (3.2.3-2.fc16) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2012-03-30 at 21:37 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Still, if it is a regression fix That is my suspicion, yes. I am waiting on feedback about the patch, related to a bug report where hibernation hangs with 3.2 (but not earlier). The cause of this bug seems to be kernel running out of pages, because hibernation code took a smidgen too much. -- Bojan