From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753297Ab2DBWLs (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Apr 2012 18:11:48 -0400 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:44830 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752279Ab2DBWLr (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Apr 2012 18:11:47 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] perf: generic intel uncore support From: Peter Zijlstra To: "Yan, Zheng" Cc: mingo@elte.hu, andi@firstfloor.org, eranian@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ming.m.lin@intel.com In-Reply-To: <4F77C75B.4060105@intel.com> References: <1332916998-10628-1-git-send-email-zheng.z.yan@intel.com> <1332916998-10628-3-git-send-email-zheng.z.yan@intel.com> <1333163902.2960.63.camel@laptop> <4F77C75B.4060105@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2012 00:11:33 +0200 Message-ID: <1333404693.2960.82.camel@laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 2012-04-01 at 11:11 +0800, Yan, Zheng wrote: > > Because using per-cpu allocation is inconvenience for PCI uncore device. What are those, where does one read about them and why?