From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757314Ab2DIPGl (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Apr 2012 11:06:41 -0400 Received: from mail-bk0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:54735 "EHLO mail-bk0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756647Ab2DIPGk (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Apr 2012 11:06:40 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] sil3531: has no PM capability, remove support. From: philby john To: Jeff Garzik Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, htejun@gmail.com In-Reply-To: <4F82F765.4010705@pobox.com> References: <1333980849.11209.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4F82F765.4010705@pobox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2012 20:37:30 +0530 Message-ID: <1333984050.12301.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 (2.32.3-1.fc14) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mo, 2012-04-09 at 10:51 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > On 04/09/2012 10:14 AM, philby john wrote: > > From: Philby John > > Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2012 19:09:51 +0530 > > Subject: [PATCH] sil3531: has no PM capability, remove support. > > > > SATA sil3531 does not support Power Management Capability and > > as per the manual Bit [31:27] is hardwired to 00h. > > Otherwise, when the device goes into suspend/resume the Power > > Management Control + Status registers are accessed and the > > arch specific readl()/__raw_readl() calls block indefinitely. > > > > This patch sets the PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_D3 flag by which the if > > condition in pci_set_power_state() evaluates to true and > > pci_raw_set_power_state() functions are not executed. > > > > Signed-off-by: Philby John > > Signed-off-by: Johnny Chiang > > --- > > drivers/pci/pci.c | 1 + > > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c > > index 8156744..129120d 100644 > > --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c > > +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c > > @@ -1863,6 +1863,7 @@ void pci_pm_init(struct pci_dev *dev) > > pci_pme_active(dev, false); > > } else { > > dev->pme_support = 0; > > + dev->dev_flags |= PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_D3; > > This patch applies to -every- piece of PCI hardware out there, not just > the sil3531... > But if pme_support is zero, isn't it ok to set dev_flags to PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_D3 ? Regards, Philby