From: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
lenb@kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
konrad.r.wilk@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ACPI: Convert wake_sleep_flags to a value instead of function (v2)
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 10:50:26 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1334026226.3044.4.camel@minggr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1334025246-8811-2-git-send-email-konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
On Mon, 2012-04-09 at 22:34 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> With commit a2ef5c4fd44ce3922435139393b89f2cce47f576
> "ACPI: Move module parameter gts and bfs to sleep.c" the wake_sleep_flags
> is required when calling acpi_enter_sleep_state, which means
> that if there are functions outside the sleep.c code they
> can't get get the wake_sleep_flags values.
>
> This converts the function in to a exported value and converts
> the module config operands to a function.
>
> [v2: Parameters can be turned on/off dynamically]
> Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep.h | 2 +
> drivers/acpi/sleep.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep.h b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep.h
> index 4d3feb5..7bab5fb 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep.h
> @@ -9,6 +9,8 @@ extern long saved_magic;
>
> extern int wakeup_pmode_return;
>
> +extern unsigned char wake_sleep_flags;
> +
Could you use "u8" same as the definition below?
Others look good to me.
Acked-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Thanks,
Lin Ming
> extern unsigned long acpi_copy_wakeup_routine(unsigned long);
> extern void wakeup_long64(void);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/sleep.c b/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
> index 6a8d4d3..86bf909 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
> @@ -28,23 +28,33 @@
> #include "internal.h"
> #include "sleep.h"
>
> +u8 wake_sleep_flags = ACPI_NO_OPTIONAL_METHODS;
> static unsigned int gts, bfs;
> -module_param(gts, uint, 0644);
> -module_param(bfs, uint, 0644);
> -MODULE_PARM_DESC(gts, "Enable evaluation of _GTS on suspend.");
> -MODULE_PARM_DESC(bfs, "Enable evaluation of _BFS on resume".);
> -
> -static u8 wake_sleep_flags(void)
> +static int set_param_wake_flag(const char *val, struct kernel_param *kp)
> {
> - u8 flags = ACPI_NO_OPTIONAL_METHODS;
> + int ret = param_set_int(val, kp);
>
> - if (gts)
> - flags |= ACPI_EXECUTE_GTS;
> - if (bfs)
> - flags |= ACPI_EXECUTE_BFS;
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
>
> - return flags;
> + if (val == (const char *)>s) {
> + if (gts)
> + wake_sleep_flags |= ACPI_EXECUTE_GTS;
> + else
> + wake_sleep_flags &= ~ACPI_EXECUTE_GTS;
> + }
> + if (val == (const char *)&bfs) {
> + if (bfs)
> + wake_sleep_flags |= ACPI_EXECUTE_BFS;
> + else
> + wake_sleep_flags &= ~ACPI_EXECUTE_BFS;
> + }
> + return ret;
> }
> +module_param_call(gts, set_param_wake_flag, param_get_int, >s, 0644);
> +module_param_call(bfs, set_param_wake_flag, param_get_int, &bfs, 0644);
> +MODULE_PARM_DESC(gts, "Enable evaluation of _GTS on suspend.");
> +MODULE_PARM_DESC(bfs, "Enable evaluation of _BFS on resume".);
>
> static u8 sleep_states[ACPI_S_STATE_COUNT];
>
> @@ -263,7 +273,6 @@ static int acpi_suspend_enter(suspend_state_t pm_state)
> {
> acpi_status status = AE_OK;
> u32 acpi_state = acpi_target_sleep_state;
> - u8 flags = wake_sleep_flags();
> int error;
>
> ACPI_FLUSH_CPU_CACHE();
> @@ -271,7 +280,7 @@ static int acpi_suspend_enter(suspend_state_t pm_state)
> switch (acpi_state) {
> case ACPI_STATE_S1:
> barrier();
> - status = acpi_enter_sleep_state(acpi_state, flags);
> + status = acpi_enter_sleep_state(acpi_state, wake_sleep_flags);
> break;
>
> case ACPI_STATE_S3:
> @@ -288,7 +297,7 @@ static int acpi_suspend_enter(suspend_state_t pm_state)
> acpi_write_bit_register(ACPI_BITREG_SCI_ENABLE, 1);
>
> /* Reprogram control registers and execute _BFS */
> - acpi_leave_sleep_state_prep(acpi_state, flags);
> + acpi_leave_sleep_state_prep(acpi_state, wake_sleep_flags);
>
> /* ACPI 3.0 specs (P62) says that it's the responsibility
> * of the OSPM to clear the status bit [ implying that the
> @@ -552,30 +561,27 @@ static int acpi_hibernation_begin(void)
>
> static int acpi_hibernation_enter(void)
> {
> - u8 flags = wake_sleep_flags();
> acpi_status status = AE_OK;
>
> ACPI_FLUSH_CPU_CACHE();
>
> /* This shouldn't return. If it returns, we have a problem */
> - status = acpi_enter_sleep_state(ACPI_STATE_S4, flags);
> + status = acpi_enter_sleep_state(ACPI_STATE_S4, wake_sleep_flags);
> /* Reprogram control registers and execute _BFS */
> - acpi_leave_sleep_state_prep(ACPI_STATE_S4, flags);
> + acpi_leave_sleep_state_prep(ACPI_STATE_S4, wake_sleep_flags);
>
> return ACPI_SUCCESS(status) ? 0 : -EFAULT;
> }
>
> static void acpi_hibernation_leave(void)
> {
> - u8 flags = wake_sleep_flags();
> -
> /*
> * If ACPI is not enabled by the BIOS and the boot kernel, we need to
> * enable it here.
> */
> acpi_enable();
> /* Reprogram control registers and execute _BFS */
> - acpi_leave_sleep_state_prep(ACPI_STATE_S4, flags);
> + acpi_leave_sleep_state_prep(ACPI_STATE_S4, wake_sleep_flags);
> /* Check the hardware signature */
> if (facs && s4_hardware_signature != facs->hardware_signature) {
> printk(KERN_EMERG "ACPI: Hardware changed while hibernated, "
> @@ -830,12 +836,10 @@ static void acpi_power_off_prepare(void)
>
> static void acpi_power_off(void)
> {
> - u8 flags = wake_sleep_flags();
> -
> /* acpi_sleep_prepare(ACPI_STATE_S5) should have already been called */
> printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s called\n", __func__);
> local_irq_disable();
> - acpi_enter_sleep_state(ACPI_STATE_S5, flags);
> + acpi_enter_sleep_state(ACPI_STATE_S5, wake_sleep_flags);
> }
>
> /*
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-10 2:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-10 2:34 [PATCH] gts and bfs fixes (v2) Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-04-10 2:34 ` [PATCH 1/2] ACPI: Convert wake_sleep_flags to a value instead of function (v2) Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-04-10 2:50 ` Lin Ming [this message]
2012-04-10 3:19 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-04-10 3:22 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-04-10 2:34 ` [PATCH 2/2] ACPI: Pass u8 flag to acpi_enter_sleep_state from lowlevel assembler Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1334026226.3044.4.camel@minggr \
--to=ming.m.lin@intel.com \
--cc=konrad.r.wilk@gmail.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox