From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: axboe@kernel.dk
Cc: vgoyal@redhat.com, ctalbott@google.com, rni@google.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 02/11] blkcg: kill blkio_list and replace blkio_list_lock with a mutex
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 13:11:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1334347895-6268-3-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1334347895-6268-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
With blkio_policy[], blkio_list is redundant and hinders with
per-queue policy activation. Remove it. Also, replace
blkio_list_lock with a mutex blkcg_pol_mutex and let it protect the
whole [un]registration.
This is to prepare for per-queue policy activation and doesn't cause
any functional difference.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
---
block/blk-cgroup.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++---------------
block/blk-cgroup.h | 1 -
2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-cgroup.c b/block/blk-cgroup.c
index 9449c38..af665fe 100644
--- a/block/blk-cgroup.c
+++ b/block/blk-cgroup.c
@@ -24,9 +24,7 @@
#define MAX_KEY_LEN 100
-static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(blkio_list_lock);
-static LIST_HEAD(blkio_list);
-
+static DEFINE_MUTEX(blkcg_pol_mutex);
static DEFINE_MUTEX(all_q_mutex);
static LIST_HEAD(all_q_list);
@@ -311,8 +309,9 @@ blkiocg_reset_stats(struct cgroup *cgroup, struct cftype *cftype, u64 val)
struct blkio_cgroup *blkcg = cgroup_to_blkio_cgroup(cgroup);
struct blkio_group *blkg;
struct hlist_node *n;
+ int i;
- spin_lock(&blkio_list_lock);
+ mutex_lock(&blkcg_pol_mutex);
spin_lock_irq(&blkcg->lock);
/*
@@ -321,15 +320,16 @@ blkiocg_reset_stats(struct cgroup *cgroup, struct cftype *cftype, u64 val)
* anyway. If you get hit by a race, retry.
*/
hlist_for_each_entry(blkg, n, &blkcg->blkg_list, blkcg_node) {
- struct blkio_policy_type *pol;
+ for (i = 0; i < BLKIO_NR_POLICIES; i++) {
+ struct blkio_policy_type *pol = blkio_policy[i];
- list_for_each_entry(pol, &blkio_list, list)
- if (pol->ops.blkio_reset_group_stats_fn)
+ if (pol && pol->ops.blkio_reset_group_stats_fn)
pol->ops.blkio_reset_group_stats_fn(blkg);
+ }
}
spin_unlock_irq(&blkcg->lock);
- spin_unlock(&blkio_list_lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&blkcg_pol_mutex);
return 0;
}
@@ -732,20 +732,21 @@ void blkio_policy_register(struct blkio_policy_type *blkiop)
{
struct request_queue *q;
+ mutex_lock(&blkcg_pol_mutex);
+
blkcg_bypass_start();
- spin_lock(&blkio_list_lock);
BUG_ON(blkio_policy[blkiop->plid]);
blkio_policy[blkiop->plid] = blkiop;
- list_add_tail(&blkiop->list, &blkio_list);
-
- spin_unlock(&blkio_list_lock);
list_for_each_entry(q, &all_q_list, all_q_node)
update_root_blkg_pd(q, blkiop->plid);
+
blkcg_bypass_end();
if (blkiop->cftypes)
WARN_ON(cgroup_add_cftypes(&blkio_subsys, blkiop->cftypes));
+
+ mutex_unlock(&blkcg_pol_mutex);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blkio_policy_register);
@@ -753,19 +754,20 @@ void blkio_policy_unregister(struct blkio_policy_type *blkiop)
{
struct request_queue *q;
+ mutex_lock(&blkcg_pol_mutex);
+
if (blkiop->cftypes)
cgroup_rm_cftypes(&blkio_subsys, blkiop->cftypes);
blkcg_bypass_start();
- spin_lock(&blkio_list_lock);
BUG_ON(blkio_policy[blkiop->plid] != blkiop);
blkio_policy[blkiop->plid] = NULL;
- list_del_init(&blkiop->list);
- spin_unlock(&blkio_list_lock);
list_for_each_entry(q, &all_q_list, all_q_node)
update_root_blkg_pd(q, blkiop->plid);
blkcg_bypass_end();
+
+ mutex_unlock(&blkcg_pol_mutex);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blkio_policy_unregister);
diff --git a/block/blk-cgroup.h b/block/blk-cgroup.h
index 64392ac..c772581 100644
--- a/block/blk-cgroup.h
+++ b/block/blk-cgroup.h
@@ -102,7 +102,6 @@ struct blkio_policy_ops {
};
struct blkio_policy_type {
- struct list_head list;
struct blkio_policy_ops ops;
enum blkio_policy_id plid;
size_t pdata_size; /* policy specific private data size */
--
1.7.7.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-13 20:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-13 20:11 [PATCHSET] block: per-queue policy activation, take#2 Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 20:11 ` [PATCH 01/11] cfq: fix build breakage & warnings Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 20:11 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2012-04-13 20:11 ` [PATCH 03/11] blkcg: use @pol instead of @plid in update_root_blkg_pd() and blkcg_print_blkgs() Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 20:11 ` [PATCH 04/11] blkcg: remove static policy ID enums Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 20:11 ` [PATCH 05/11] blkcg: make blkg_conf_prep() take @pol and return with queue lock held Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 20:11 ` [PATCH 06/11] blkcg: make sure blkg_lookup() returns %NULL if @q is bypassing Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 21:50 ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 20:11 ` [PATCH 07/11] blkcg: make request_queue bypassing on allocation Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 20:32 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-04-13 20:37 ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 20:44 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-04-13 20:47 ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 20:55 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-04-13 21:05 ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 21:16 ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 21:31 ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-17 12:04 ` James Bottomley
2012-04-18 21:42 ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 21:33 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-04-13 21:38 ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-16 12:39 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-04-13 20:37 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-04-13 20:11 ` [PATCH 08/11] blkcg: add request_queue->root_blkg Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 20:11 ` [PATCH 09/11] blkcg: implement per-queue policy activation Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 20:11 ` [PATCH 10/11] blkcg: drop stuff unused after per-queue policy activation update Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 20:11 ` [PATCH 11/11] blkcg: shoot down blkgs if all policies are deactivated Tejun Heo
2012-04-20 8:09 ` [PATCHSET] block: per-queue policy activation, take#2 Jens Axboe
2012-04-20 12:02 ` Jens Axboe
2012-04-20 17:17 ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-20 19:08 ` Jens Axboe
2012-04-25 18:19 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1334347895-6268-3-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ctalbott@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rni@google.com \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox