From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752996Ab2DPKJX (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Apr 2012 06:09:23 -0400 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:34653 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752042Ab2DPKJV convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Apr 2012 06:09:21 -0400 Message-ID: <1334570935.28150.25.camel@twins> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] uprobes: introduce is_swbp_at_addr_fast() From: Peter Zijlstra To: Oleg Nesterov Cc: Ingo Molnar , Srikar Dronamraju , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli , Jim Keniston , LKML , Linux-mm , Andi Kleen , Christoph Hellwig , Steven Rostedt , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Masami Hiramatsu , Thomas Gleixner , Anton Arapov Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 12:08:55 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20120405222106.GB19166@redhat.com> References: <20120405222024.GA19154@redhat.com> <20120405222106.GB19166@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2- Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2012-04-06 at 00:21 +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > +int __weak is_swbp_at_addr_fast(unsigned long vaddr) > +{ > + uprobe_opcode_t opcode; > + int fault; > + > + pagefault_disable(); > + fault = __copy_from_user_inatomic(&opcode, (void __user*)vaddr, > + sizeof(opcode)); > + pagefault_enable(); > + > + if (unlikely(fault)) { > + /* > + * XXX: read_opcode() lacks FOLL_FORCE, it can fail if > + * we race with another thread which does mprotect(NONE) > + * after we hit bp. > + */ > + if (read_opcode(current->mm, vaddr, &opcode)) > + return -EFAULT; > + } > + > + return is_swbp_insn(&opcode); > +} Why bother with the pagefault_disable() and unlikely fault case and not simply do copy_from_user() and have it deal with the fault if its needed anyway?