From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754706Ab2DPPea (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Apr 2012 11:34:30 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:42432 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753945Ab2DPPe2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Apr 2012 11:34:28 -0400 Message-ID: <1334590461.2250.0.camel@localhost> Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (security tree related) From: Eric Paris To: Will Drewry Cc: Stephen Rothwell , James Morris , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Kees Cook Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 11:34:21 -0400 In-Reply-To: References: <20120416154607.302f7ae245472e1e917dacef@canb.auug.org.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2012-04-16 at 10:32 -0500, Will Drewry wrote: > Thanks for this, and the other two fixes! I'll pull together a patch > fixing up the other call sites. My past revisions had avoided this by > using a new symbol, and I totally forgot to touch these up in the last > round. > > What's the best way to submit the clean up -- against the security-next tree? > > Thanks and sorry for the noise! Just send fixes to James and they will get picked up by Stephen the day after he commits them to security-next. -Eric