From: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
To: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@amd.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>, lenb <lenb@kernel.org>,
linux-acpi <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ACPI: D3 states cleanup
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 13:37:35 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1334900255.4927.36.camel@minggr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120420052259.GA21040@localhost.amd.com>
On Fri, 2012-04-20 at 13:23 +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 11:19:13AM +0800, Lin Ming wrote:
> > On Fri, 2012-04-20 at 10:23 +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 09:19:09AM +0800, Lin Ming wrote:
> > > > There are two ACPI D3 states defined now:
> > > > ACPI_STATE_D3 and ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD.
> > > >
> > > > But the uses of these states are not clear/correct in some code.
> > > > For example, some code refer ACPI_STATE_D3 as D3hot and others refer
> > > > it as D3cold.
> > > >
> > > > This patch introduces ACPI_STATE_D3_HOT to refer to ACPI D3hot state.
> > > > And changes ACPI_STATE_D3 to refer to ACPI D3cold state only.
> > > > Also redefines ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD the same as ACPI_STATE_D3.
> > > >
> > >
> > > With this patch now, if a device has _PS3, then we will set its D3hot
> > > flag valid. This doesn't feel right to me, since per our discussion the
> > > other day, we should assume _PS3 will put the device into D3cold.
> > >
> > > Or do you mean: if _PS3 is available, then both D3hot and D3cold is
> > > valid from the perspective of acpi, it is the individual driver's
> > > responsibility to decide which state is actually valid and will be used.
> >
> > Right.
> >
> > ACPI_STATE_D3(same as ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD now) is always valid.
> >
>
> I mean, if _PS3 is available, can we say D3hot is valid?
Yes.
Lin Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-20 5:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-20 1:19 [PATCH v2] ACPI: D3 states cleanup Lin Ming
2012-04-20 2:23 ` Aaron Lu
2012-04-20 3:19 ` Lin Ming
2012-04-20 5:23 ` Aaron Lu
2012-04-20 5:37 ` Lin Ming [this message]
2012-04-20 7:47 ` Aaron Lu
2012-04-20 11:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-20 15:14 ` Lin Ming
2012-04-22 11:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-21 1:36 ` Lu, Aaron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1334900255.4927.36.camel@minggr \
--to=ming.m.lin@intel.com \
--cc=aaron.lu@amd.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox