From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Yanmin Zhang <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
"Tu, Xiaobing" <xiaobing.tu@intel.com>,
Lin Ming <mlin@ss.pku.edu.cn>,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"mingo@elte.hu" <mingo@elte.hu>,
"rusty@rustcorp.com.au" <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"rostedt@goodmis.org" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"Zuo, Jiao" <jiao.zuo@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/2] kernel patch for dump user space stack tool
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 11:54:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1334915668.2463.43.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1334812653.14538.29.camel@ymzhang.sh.intel.com>
On Thu, 2012-04-19 at 13:17 +0800, Yanmin Zhang wrote:
> 1) We could collect the HEX-format call chain data and /proc/XXX/maps
> of all the processes quickly, then parse them either after rebooting, or
> after the issue is reported. It could catch the scene just at the time point
> when the error happens. Our experiments shows the tool could collect the data
> of all processes within 200ms.
No you can't, ever heard of address space randomization?
> 2) The new tool won't stop the processes and have less impact on them.
> Considering a scenario of performance bottleneck investigation, statistics collection
> shouldn't have big impact on running processes.
Maybe.. on these tiny systems you're working on most tasks will not be
runnable anyway since you only have 1 (maybe 2) cpus and what's running
is your dumper process, so most everything isn't runnable, attaching and
dumping stack of all tasks isn't really much more expensive than this.
the open/read/close you do on the proc files, along with the readdir
etc.. are system-calls just like the ptrace alternative.
> 3) It could support both i386 and x86-64. I tried pstack and it doesn't work
> with x86-64.
Yeah, and you'll need to extend it to ARM/MIPS/etc.. whereas there is
plenty of userspace around that can already work on all those platforms
-- if pstack cannot its weird, I'd think it would use all the regular
binutils muck that already supports all the platforms.
> 4) It follows /proc/XXX/stack interface and it's easy to use it.
Uhm, not so very much, see your ASLR issue. Furthermore it requires all
userspace be build with framepointers enabled -- which I think would be
a good thing anyway -- but with which reality seems to disagree.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-20 9:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-17 14:37 [RFC 1/2] kernel patch for dump user space stack tool Tu, Xiaobing
2012-04-19 3:50 ` Cong Wang
2012-04-19 5:17 ` Yanmin Zhang
2012-04-19 6:13 ` Cong Wang
2012-04-19 6:28 ` Yanmin Zhang
2012-04-20 9:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-24 0:56 ` Yanmin Zhang
2012-04-20 9:54 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2012-04-24 2:19 ` Yanmin Zhang
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-04-11 8:07 Tu, Xiaobing
2012-04-17 4:43 ` Lin Ming
2012-04-17 14:38 ` Tu, Xiaobing
2012-04-20 9:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-24 1:30 ` Yanmin Zhang
2012-04-24 10:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-25 2:58 ` Yanmin Zhang
2012-04-24 10:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-25 2:44 ` Yanmin Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1334915668.2463.43.camel@laptop \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jiao.zuo@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mlin@ss.pku.edu.cn \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=xiaobing.tu@intel.com \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
--cc=yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox