linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Myron Stowe <mstowe@redhat.com>
To: Meelis Roos <mroos@linux.ee>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Subject: Re: x86: runtime waring in pcibios_fwaddrmap_lookup
Date: Tue, 01 May 2012 14:54:54 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1335905694.2386.138.camel@zim.stowe> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.SOC.1.00.1204280819270.14507@math.ut.ee>

On Sat, 2012-04-28 at 08:36 +0300, Meelis Roos wrote:
> > So, somehow, your system hit the assertion (WARN_ON) in
> > pcibios_fwaddrmap_lookup().  From the dmesg log you provided I can see
> > why pcibios_save_fw_addr() was called - there is a resource collision
> > with the video device's GART - but what I don't understand is how the
> > assertion is being triggered.
> > 
> > There are only two callers of pcibios_fwaddrmap_lookup()
> > (see ./arch/x86/pci/i386.c:: pcibios_save_fw_addr(), and
> > pcibios_retrieve_fw_addr()) and both of those are acquiring the lock
> > before making the call - so triggering the assertion just doesn't seem
> > possible but obviously it is getting triggered.
> > 
> > I don't have any ideas currently but do have some questions that
> > hopefully will start to enlighten us.
> > 
> >         Does your system encounter this consistently upon every boot or
> >         is it hit intermittently?
> 
> Every time.
> 
> >         Do you know of any kernel versions that do not encounter it?
> 
> Checked my logs, no kernel up to 3.3.0 included gave it, next tested 
> kernel was 3.4.0-rc2 and that had the warning and every kernel since has 
> had it.
> 
> >         Are you running a para-virtualized kernel?
> 
> No.

Thanks for the quick response Meelis (unlike myself; I've been consumed
with a hard deadline task recently - sorry).

I got together with Bjorn and after showing him the paths, and locking,
he also did not see how we could be hitting the WARN_ON.  I would like
to take advantage of your system since it encounters this consistently
but really have no idea how to progress currently.  I'll query a couple
of my colleagues for suggestions.  In the meantime, if anyone else -
Jesse - has any ideas, please speak up.

As for you noticing this after 3.3.0 that makes sense as the WARN_ON was
added with 3.3.0.

Myron





  reply	other threads:[~2012-05-01 20:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-12 19:41 x86: runtime waring in pcibios_fwaddrmap_lookup Meelis Roos
2012-04-13  1:38 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-04-27 20:14   ` Myron Stowe
2012-04-28  5:36     ` Meelis Roos
2012-05-01 20:54       ` Myron Stowe [this message]
2012-05-07 22:44         ` Myron Stowe
2012-05-13 15:15           ` Meelis Roos
2012-05-14 20:21             ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-05-14 20:53               ` Meelis Roos
2012-05-15 23:02                 ` Bjorn Helgaas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1335905694.2386.138.camel@zim.stowe \
    --to=mstowe@redhat.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mroos@linux.ee \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).