From: Myron Stowe <mstowe@redhat.com>
To: Meelis Roos <mroos@linux.ee>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Subject: Re: x86: runtime waring in pcibios_fwaddrmap_lookup
Date: Tue, 01 May 2012 14:54:54 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1335905694.2386.138.camel@zim.stowe> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.SOC.1.00.1204280819270.14507@math.ut.ee>
On Sat, 2012-04-28 at 08:36 +0300, Meelis Roos wrote:
> > So, somehow, your system hit the assertion (WARN_ON) in
> > pcibios_fwaddrmap_lookup(). From the dmesg log you provided I can see
> > why pcibios_save_fw_addr() was called - there is a resource collision
> > with the video device's GART - but what I don't understand is how the
> > assertion is being triggered.
> >
> > There are only two callers of pcibios_fwaddrmap_lookup()
> > (see ./arch/x86/pci/i386.c:: pcibios_save_fw_addr(), and
> > pcibios_retrieve_fw_addr()) and both of those are acquiring the lock
> > before making the call - so triggering the assertion just doesn't seem
> > possible but obviously it is getting triggered.
> >
> > I don't have any ideas currently but do have some questions that
> > hopefully will start to enlighten us.
> >
> > Does your system encounter this consistently upon every boot or
> > is it hit intermittently?
>
> Every time.
>
> > Do you know of any kernel versions that do not encounter it?
>
> Checked my logs, no kernel up to 3.3.0 included gave it, next tested
> kernel was 3.4.0-rc2 and that had the warning and every kernel since has
> had it.
>
> > Are you running a para-virtualized kernel?
>
> No.
Thanks for the quick response Meelis (unlike myself; I've been consumed
with a hard deadline task recently - sorry).
I got together with Bjorn and after showing him the paths, and locking,
he also did not see how we could be hitting the WARN_ON. I would like
to take advantage of your system since it encounters this consistently
but really have no idea how to progress currently. I'll query a couple
of my colleagues for suggestions. In the meantime, if anyone else -
Jesse - has any ideas, please speak up.
As for you noticing this after 3.3.0 that makes sense as the WARN_ON was
added with 3.3.0.
Myron
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-01 20:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-12 19:41 x86: runtime waring in pcibios_fwaddrmap_lookup Meelis Roos
2012-04-13 1:38 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-04-27 20:14 ` Myron Stowe
2012-04-28 5:36 ` Meelis Roos
2012-05-01 20:54 ` Myron Stowe [this message]
2012-05-07 22:44 ` Myron Stowe
2012-05-13 15:15 ` Meelis Roos
2012-05-14 20:21 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-05-14 20:53 ` Meelis Roos
2012-05-15 23:02 ` Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1335905694.2386.138.camel@zim.stowe \
--to=mstowe@redhat.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mroos@linux.ee \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).